Connect with us

Politics

Supreme Court won’t impose new limits on juvenile life sentences

Published

on

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court declined Thursday to impose new restrictions on sentencing juvenile offenders to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

By a 6-3 vote, the court upheld a life sentence for a Mississippi man, Brett Jones, who was 15 when he used a knife to kill his grandfather during an argument.

Nine years ago, the Supreme Court said mandatory life sentences for juveniles convicted of homicide violated the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment because such punishments failed to take into account a youthful offender’s immaturity. But the ruling allowed life sentences if the judge or jury had discretion to impose a lesser punishment.

A separate case extended that ruling to juveniles already convicted and sentenced.

Jones argued that the earlier rulings required those doing the sentencing to determine whether a juvenile offender was “permanently incorrigible,” but Thursday’s decision said no such finding is necessary.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who wrote the majority opinion, said the kind of discretionary sentencing followed by Mississippi “has resulted in numerous sentences less than life without parole for defendants who otherwise would have received mandatory life-without-parole sentences.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Elena Kagan. She wrote that the court’s earlier rulings said a lifetime sentence for a juvenile offender is disproportionate for all but the rarest children whose crimes represent irreparable corruption.

“The question is whether the state, at some point, must consider whether a juvenile offender has demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation sufficient to merit a chance at life beyond the prison in which he has grown up. For most, the answer is yes,” she wrote.



Source link

Politics

Brexit tensions set to explode: Frost issues new ultimatum to EU –threatens to rip up deal

Published

on

LORD FROST has reiterated the UK is not afraid of ripping up the Northern Ireland Protocol in remarks that will ramp up EU tensions already on the brink of boiling over.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

If Scotland gets independence, will Sturgeon change SNP's name to Alba?

Published

on

NICOLA STURGEON has been blasted by critics for trying to manipulate a second independence referendum in terms of who can vote. But could Sturgeon change the SNP’s name to Alba if Scotland gets independence?

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Schumer urges passage of elections bill in the Senate

Published

on

IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending