Connect with us

Politics

Trump curses McConnell’s name during rant at Republican donor event

Published

on

Former President Donald Trump again lashed out at Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., calling the top Republican a “dumb son of a b—-” and a “stone cold loser” amid a lengthy rant at a Republican donor event Saturday night in which he also reiterated his false claims of electoral victory last fall.

Trump, according to a source familiar with his remarks, said “a real leader” never would have accepted the electoral results. That narrative, which Trump spun for months after losing last fall, led to the deadly Capitol riot on Jan. 6 and his second impeachment trial soon after.

Rioters inside the Capitol could be heard in one video chanting “hang Mike Pence” and had erected a gallows outside the building. Trump also said Saturday that he was “disappointed” his former vice president affirmed the Electoral College votes.

“If that were [Senate Majority Leader Chuck] Schumer instead of this dumb son of a b—- Mitch McConnell, they would never allow it to happen,” Trump said. “They would have fought it.”

After the impeachment trial, McConnell excoriated Trump for his conduct, though he did not vote to convict him. Soon after, Trump released a lengthy statement blasting McConnell as “a dour, sullen, and unsmiling political hack.”

Days later, McConnell said he would back Trump for president if he were the 2024 GOP nominee. At roughly the same time, Trump began endorsing GOP senators who criticized his conduct around the riot, like Sens. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., and John Boozman, R-Ark., for reelection.

Trump addressed the crowd of Republican donors at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida for roughly an hour. His speech was the only portion of the Republican National Committee donor retreat that took place there, as other events were held at the Four Seasons in Palm Beach. Last month, Trump’s attorneys asked the RNC, National Republican Congressional Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee to stop using his name and likeness to fundraise as he pushed donors to give directly to his committee.

Speaking Saturday, Trump also mocked former Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, who resigned from his administration after the riot and is married to McConnell.”

“I hired his wife. Did he ever say thank you?” Trump said, adding sarcastically on her decision to resign after Jan. 6: “She suffered so greatly.”

While attacking McConnell and other Republicans in his address, particularly those who voted against him in the most recent impeachment proceedings, Trump also called for party unity.

In saying he was “so disappointed” with Pence for affirming President Joe Biden’s victory, Trump added, “I like him so much.”

He praised attendees of his “Save America” rally on Jan. 6 — which preceded the Capitol riot.

Addressing the pandemic, the former president said he was not getting enough credit for his administration overseeing the development of the vaccines and suggested they be called the “Trumpcine.”

He repeated his longtime mockery of Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, for his errant opening pitch at a Washington Nationals game last summer and for his pandemic analysis and advice, saying Fauci is, “so full of crap.”

Representatives for Trump, Pence and McConnell did not immediately return requests for comment from NBC News.

Addressing Trump’s remarks about McConnell, Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., told “Fox News Sunday” he believes “a lot of that rhetoric is part of the style and tone that comes with the former president.”

“But I think he and Mitch McConnell have a common goal,” said Thune, the second-highest ranking Senate Republican. “And that is, getting the majority back in 2022 and hopefully in the end that will be the thing that unites us.”

On CNN’s “State of the Union,” Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, a Republican who Trump lambasted last week after he vetoed an anti-transgender healthcare bill, said in response to the former president’s Saturday commentary that, “anything that’s divisive is a concern and is not helpful for us fighting the battles in Washington and at the state level.”

“In some ways, it’s not a big deal, what he said,” Hutchinson added. “But, at the same time, whenever it draws attention, we don’t need that. We need unity. We need to be focused together. We have slim majorities — or slim numbers in Washington, and we have got battles to fight. So, we need to get beyond that.”



Source link

Politics

Ruth Davidson blasts voter ID proposal as 'total b*****s' – 'Problem doesn't exist'

Published

on

RUTH DAVIDSON, former Scottish Conservatives leader, has blasted the Government’s voter ID proposal.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Lawmakers warn Pentagon of impending bloodbath for Afghan partners

Published

on

WASHINGTON — Two lawmakers who are veterans of the war in Afghanistan warned a Pentagon official on Wednesday that Afghans who had worked for the U.S. government would be hunted down by the Taliban unless the Biden administration organized an emergency evacuation before American troops withdraw in four months.

“We need to get these people out,” Republican Rep. Michael Waltz, a former Green Beret who saw combat in Afghanistan, said at a House Armed Services Committee hearing. He said U.S partners faced a “death sentence” when the U.S. leaves.

Waltz and other lawmakers expressed frustration at the hearing with David Helvey, the acting assistant defense secretary for the Indo-Pacific, about the Biden administration’s plans for tens of thousands of Afghans who face retribution from the Taliban for their association with the U.S. government or other Western organizations. Helvey said the Pentagon would be able to evacuate the Afghans if it were requested, but the lawmakers wanted to know what steps were imminent.

“We need to evacuate them out,” Waltz told Helvey. “What’s preventing you from doing that?”

Helvey replied that the administration hoped to see the Taliban and the Afghan government reach a peace settlement to end the conflict. “We’re focusing on a peaceful outcome in Afghanistan.”

Peace talks between the Taliban and their adversaries in the Afghan government have stalled.

Waltz said the Biden administration had to take action now to save the lives of Afghan partners and fly them out to a U.S. military base or territory outside the country, where their paperwork could be vetted and reviewed.

“These people who stood with us are being hunted down as we speak,” said Waltz.

The congressman recounted how one of the interpreters he had worked with was murdered by the Taliban six years ago after he was stopped at an insurgent checkpoint on his way to the U.S. embassy in Kabul. The interpreter was heading to the embassy with documents to apply for a visa under a program set up for Afghans who were employed by the U.S., Waltz said.

“I want to be clear, we need an evacuation plan and time is of the essence,” the Republican lawmaker said.

“We are working with our inter-agency partners to look at the resources and mechanisms to support those folks,” Helvey said.

But Waltz said when the remaining U.S. forces leave as scheduled in September, former Afghan partners would have a target on their back.

“When that last soldier goes wheels up, we have essentially handed them a death sentence,” Waltz said.

To help Afghan interpreters and others who face retribution from the Taliban for their links to the U.S., Congress in 2009 set up the Special Immigrant Visa, or SIV, program, to provide U.S. visas to Afghans who had been employed by the U.S. government. The program has a backlog years long. More than 17,000 Afghans have applied, and their paperwork is still being reviewed.

“We do have a special responsibility to support and protect those who supported and protected us for the past 20 years,“ Helvey told lawmakers. He suggested Congress devote more resources to the SIV program as a way to help Afghans who worked with the United States.

Veterans organizations from across the political spectrum sent a letter to President Joe Biden on Monday calling for an evacuation of Afghan partners to American territory.

Rep. Jason Crow, a Democrat from Colorado and former Army Ranger who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, said at the hearing Wednesday he might not be alive today without the help of interpreters.

Crow asked Helvey if the Defense Department was ready to organize an evacuation of Afghans who were employed by the U.S. government.

“If directed to do so, we can,” Helvey said.

Rep. Jason Crow, D-Co., speaks during a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol, on April 22, 2021.Erin Scott / Reuters file

Crow pressed him on which agency in the U.S. government was taking the lead on the issue.

Helvey said he believed it was the State Department.

“You believe or do you know?” Crow asked.

“I do not know for sure,” Helvey said. “It depends on what we’re talking about.”

Crow said there was a moral and national security imperative to take action to airlift Afghan partners out of the country.

“We are several weeks into this drawdown. We have no time left. “

Helvey said the administration had no agreements in place in neighboring countries that would allow access to bases for U.S. troops or permission for overflight into Afghanistan for surveillance or counterterrorism-related missions. The administration is “exploring” options with some regional governments, he said.

Discussions were underway with Kabul on the size of the future U.S. diplomatic mission after troops withdraw; as well as how the U.S. would help train Afghan security forces or collect intelligence without boots on the ground, according to Helvey.

The Pentagon official offered few details on a number of key questions, including the nature of the Taliban’s relationship with al Qaeda, and said he would address the topics in a classified hearing later on Wednesday.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Republicans announce federal bills to ‘restrict the spread’ of critical race theory

Published

on

A group of House Republicans on Wednesday took recent attacks on critical race theory a step further by introducing a pair of bills to ban diversity training for federal employees and the military.

Some 30 GOP representatives have signed on to support both the Combatting Racist Training in the Military Act and the Stop CRT Act, Rep. Dan Bishop of North Carolina said at a news conference in Washington.

The first bill is a companion to legislation introduced by Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas that aims to prohibit teaching “Anti-American and racist theories” such as critical race theory at any academic institution related to the U.S. Armed Forces. The Stop CRT Act works to codify former President Donald Trump’s executive order banning diversity and racial equity training for federal employees — an order President Joe Biden reversed in January.

“Critical race theory is a divisive ideology that threatens to poison the American psyche,” Bishop said at the news conference. “For the sake of our children’s future, we must stop this effort to cancel the truth of our founding and our country.”

He said the initial bill “stands for the idea that CRT does not belong in our armed forces. The Stop CRT Act will be the most comprehensive legislation to restrict the spread of CRT.”

The bills are the latest in a string of proposed legislation targeting diversity and anti-racism teaching — which is being characterized as critical race theory — in several states across the country. Such bills in Idaho, Louisiana, Rhode Island and Tennessee target the teaching of anti-racism in schools.

Conservative leaders began focusing on critical race theory after Trump used the decades-old academic term in a September 2020 memo ordering the Office of Management and Budget to stop funding diversity training. Around the same time, educators were using the Pulitzer Prize-winning 2019 New York Times “1619 Project” in the classroom to teach a more holistic history of the country. So, Republican leaders began publicly criticizing both the project and critical race theory, often using the term to describe all anti-racism efforts.

“Many that are condemning critical race theory haven’t read it or studied it intensely,” Jonathan Chism, assistant professor of history at the University of Houston–Downtown and co-editor of “Critical Race Studies Across Disciplines,” previously told NBC. “This is largely predicated on fear: the fear of losing power and influence and privilege. The larger issue that this is all stemming from is a desire to deny the truth about America, about racism.”

Critical race theory is a concept that seeks to understand racism and inequality in the United States by exploring and exposing the ways it affects legal and social systems. The school of thought was founded by academics including Derrick Bell, Alan Freeman, Richard Delgado, Kimberlé Crenshaw and others in the 1970s and ‘80s and builds on critical legal studies and radical feminism.

On Wednesday, the Republican leaders said they hope the two proposed bills will continue the work Trump started. The news comes just hours after the Texas House passed a bill to limit what educators can teach about the nation’s history of racism and contentious current events. Dozens of education, business and community groups in the state condemned the bill, noting that it would limit local control. Texas state Rep. Jarvis Johnson, a Democrat from Houston, called the bill “tyranny,” according to The Texas Tribune.

“We have come to this body and have made the decision to tell our teachers how and what to teach,” Johnson told the paper, noting that there is “not one agency that has compelled a teacher to teach critical race theory, so this author literally is legislating nothing — an overreach of power.”

Follow NBCBLK on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending