Connect with us

Politics

Why Biden’s poll lead is different than Hillary Clinton’s

Published

on

WASHINGTON — For many political junkies and analysts, the 2020 presidential campaign feels eerily familiar. The national polls show the Democrat has a big lead. There are some usually Republican states that seem to be in play. And the Trump campaign is relying heavily on a base-focus strategy.

It’s all very 2016 and it has Trump and Biden supporters wondering in the final tally in November could look similar as well.

The similarities to four years ago are impossible to ignore, but a closer look at the poll numbers shows 2020 holds some important differences, beyond the COVID-19 pandemic and a high unemployment rate.

Let’s start with the big similarity that also holds a big difference. This week’s NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll (conducted October 9-12) showed Joe Biden ahead of President Donald Trump by 11 points among registered voters. In 2016, a poll conducted on almost the exact same days (October 10-13) showed Hillary Clinton ahead of Trump by 10 points among registered voters.

But there is a big difference in those two polls. Biden is over 50 percent in this week’s poll, (53 percent to be precise), while Clinton was at 47 percent in 2016. That means that, as of this week, Biden is in a much stronger position than Clinton was.

Even if Trump gathered up all the other non-Biden votes, he would only be at 47 percent. That would be one-point better than the 46 percent he actually got in the final 2016 tally. At 53 percent, Biden is already five points higher than the 48 percent Clinton received in the final 2016 tally.

There is another similarity that actually works out to be a big difference, the number of people who believe the country is “off on the wrong track.” In the latest poll, that number, 62 percent, is very close to where it was in 2016, 65 percent.

Why is that similarity a difference? Because a high wrong-track number tends to be thought of as a problem for the incumbent party. A full 62 percent feeling bad about where the country is headed means people may be more likely to be looking for a change in leadership. In 2016, Trump was the change agent. In 2020, he’s the man in power. Incumbency has its privileges, but it also has its problems.

The other differences between 2016 and 2020 are a bit more Biden-specific.

First off there are the feelings people have about the Democratic nominee. He is in positive territory with voters, while Clinton was not.

Among all registered voters, 43 percent say they have positive feelings toward Biden, while 42 percent say they have negative feelings, that’s a net positive of one. That may not sound like much, but at this point in 2016, Clinton’s “feeling thermometer” was a net negative of 10. Her numbers were 40 percent positive versus 50 percent negative.

And for comparison, President Trump’s rating is current feeling rating is a 42 percent positive and 53 percent negative – a net negative 11.

The numbers also look different among some very important voter groups: independent voters, 65-and-older voters and white voters. Biden is doing better against Trump than Clinton did in 2016.

Among Independent voters, always an important part of the electorate in a time when Democrats and Republicans tend to vote along hyper-partisan lines, Biden holds a seven-percentage point lead over Trump. Four years ago, Trump narrowly led with independents by one point.

In addition, many more independents have settled on one of the two major candidates in 2020 than in 2016: 85 percent versus 62 percent. That means there may be less chance for movement among them.

Older voters have also flipped their partisan allegiance in this year’s poll. Biden currently leads Trump among voters 65-and-older by 10 percentage points, 54 percent to 44 percent. In 2016, Trump narrowly led among those voters, 46 percent to 45 percent.

That’s important because senior voters tend to vote in larger numbers than the nation as a whole and many of them live in 2020 battleground states. Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin hold a greater percentage of seniors than the nation overall.

And finally, Biden has made inroads with white voters in 2020 compared to Clinton in 2016. Biden still isn’t winning white voters, but he is only losing them by four percentage points, 46 percent to 50 percent for Trump. In 2016, Clinton trailed Trump by nine points among whites.

That matters because whites are still the largest share of the electorate by far, much larger than the share made up by minority group voters. In 2016, whites made up 74 percent of the electorate, according to Pew Research Center. In other words, every percentage point of movement equals a lot of voters

What’s the significance of Biden trailing Trump by four points among white voters? In 2008, Barack Obama lost the white voters by 12 percentage points to Sen. John McCain, but Obama still won the popular vote 53 percent to 46 percent.

The polls can still move, of course, but November 3, is now only a little more than two weeks away. And even if 2020 may look and feel a bit like 2016 to some – with a surprise ending looming – the numbers suggest there are some substantial differences this year.

Source link

Politics

'Get out now!' Boris Johnson told to pull the UK out of EU trade talks as time runs out

Published

on

BORIS JOHNSON has been told to pull the UK out of trade talks with the EU as time is running out to reach an agreement, a new poll has shown.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump campaign website hacked

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s campaign website appeared to fall victim to hackers Tuesday night.

“This site was seized,” read a message that was briefly posted on a page at donaldjtrump.com. The “world has had enough of the fake news spreaded daily” by the president, it continued.

The message said it had information that “discredits” the president and his family, and it demanded cryptocurrency to either release or withhold the information.

An image of www.donaldjtrump.com

The site soon appeared to go offline, and it was restored without the hacked message a short time later.

A spokesman for the Trump campaign, Tim Murtaugh, said the “website was defaced and we are working with law enforcement authorities to investigate the source of the attack.”

“There was no exposure to sensitive data because none of it is actually stored on the site,” he said. “The website has been restored.”

In July, hackers managed to break into numerous Twitter accounts, including those of Trump rival Joe Biden and former President Barack Obama, in a different scam aimed at getting cryptocurrency. Trump’s account was not affected. A Florida teenager was charged with being the mastermind of the scam.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Unelected Lord issues meddling warning to Boris Johnson on Scottish independence

Published

on

AN UNELECTED peer has intervened in the Scottish independence debate as Boris Johnson has been warned Scotland could be independent within a decade.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending