Connect with us


Pelosi says House to vote Wednesday to send Trump impeachment articles to Senate



Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday that the House will vote Wednesday to send the two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump to the Senate, three sources in a Democratic caucus meeting told NBC News on Tuesday.

Sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate is necessary to begin the trial. Pelosi on Wednesday will also name the House “managers” who will prosecute the case against Trump in the Senate, the sources said.

A Wednesday vote could lead to a trial beginning next Tuesday, which lawmakers are expecting.

Pelosi has held onto the articles for weeks, saying she would not submit them to the Senate until Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., outlined the trial rules and process.

McConnell, who pledged “total coordination” with the White House on impeachment last month, has called for a two-step procedure similar to that of President Bill Clinton’s trial in 1999. That process included an initial resolution to hear opening arguments, followed by a vote on whether to call witnesses.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., wants the Senate to call four witnesses, including acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton, who said this month he would testify if subpoenaed. Trump suggested last week he might block Bolton’s testimony.

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

The House passed two articles of impeachment against Trump last month. The first charged the president with abusing his power by pushing Ukraine to announce investigations of former Vice President Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden and Democrats as the president withheld nearly $400 million in military aid to the country and an official White House visit for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. The second article charged Trump with obstructing Congress’ investigation into the matter.

Speaking to reporters outside the caucus meeting on Tuesday, Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, said that “everything” will be done by the House on Wednesday, including naming impeachment managers and voting on the resolution to approve them and send the articles to the Senate.

“The resolution will be done tomorrow, the managers will be named, and the resolution will have take about a 10-minute debate, and we’ll vote on it and then send it, send everything over,” he said.

Lawmakers who emerged from the closed-door meeting said that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., walked through the upcoming process step by step, outlining what a trial might look like.

“Without going word for word as to what he said, basically the House will present its case — they have 24 hours to do so,” Rep. G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., said. “And then the president will have 24 hours to respond.”

The impeachment managers essentially act as prosecutors during the Senate trial. Though Pelosi’s picks have yet to be revealed, several lawmakers who left the meeting said they expect that Schiff will be chosen, and potentially House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. Lawmakers said, however, they still don’t know who the managers are or how many there will be.

Pelosi is free to name an unspecified number of House members as managers. Clinton’s had 13, while the House sent seven case managers in former President Andrew Johnson’s trial.

The caucus has great confidence in Adam and in Jerry (and) both of those committees played a major role,” Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., said, calling Schiff the “face of impeachment.”

Nadler also spoke during the meeting and declined afterward to say whether he will serve as a manager but he did emphasize that the trial must include witnesses and documents.

“The American people understand that to have a trial — whether the trial was of a bank robbery or the impeachment of the president of the United States — you can’t have a trial without witnesses and documents,” Nadler said. “Anyone who tries to say, ‘we’re gonna have a trial without permitting witnesses,’ is saying, ‘We want to have a cover-up. We don’t want to have a trial.'”

“Does the Senate Majority, the Republicans, want to carry out a cover-up? I think they do,” Nadler added. “Certainly Mitch McConnell has said he wants to do a cover-up.”

Speaking from the Senate floor Tuesday, McConnell said it was “bizarre-o-world” to think the Senate trial amounts to a “cover-up” if no additional witnesses or documents are presented.

“Here’s how deep we have come into bizarre-o-world,” he said. “The latest Democratic talking point is that if the Senate conducts a trial based on what the House itself looked at, we’ll be engaged in a cover-up. Did you get that? Unless the Senate steps outside our lane and takes it upon ourselves to supplement the House case, it’s a cover-up?”

Some Republicans have signaled that they are open to hearing from additional witnesses after the case has been presented to the Senate.

“I want to make sure I have a chance to vote on whether we need additional witnesses or additional documents, and I’ll decide whether we do after I hear the case and ask my questions,” Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., told reporters Tuesday.

Mitch Felan, Frank Thorp V and Julie Tsirkin contributed.

Source link


‘No surrender!’ Boris told not to compromise on trade as Brexit talks on brink – poll



BORIS JOHNSON should not seek a compromise with the European Union despite post-Brexit trade talks breaking down a day earlier than scheduled, a poll of readers has found.

Source link

Continue Reading


EU digs its heels in: Brussels blames Britain for no progress – ‘Not our fault!’



BRUSSELS has continued its assault on the UK for the lack of progress made in the current Brexit talks between the two sides.

Source link

Continue Reading


Senate Republicans cool to 2nd round of stimulus checks, direct deposits



WASHINGTON — Democrats want another round of direct stimulus payments to Americans up to $1,200 as coronavirus cases rise in dozens of states. President Donald Trump isn’t ruling it out. But Senate Republicans are on the fence or opposed, complicating its prospects.

“I wasn’t supportive of the first round. I don’t think I’d be supportive of the second,” said Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis. “This is not a classic recession that requires financial stimulus.”

House Democrats have passed a $3 trillion bill that includes another round of direct deposits and checks. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has endorsed that bill nudged Senate Republicans on Thursday to “get off their hands and finally work with Democrats to quickly provide additional federal fiscal relief.”

Senate Majority Whip Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., said Republicans are divided on whether to send more money to Americans when asked about Trump’s interest in a second round of payments.

“About direct payments or some of the checks — that’s something he’s talked about, and some of our members are interested in that as well. There are some of our members who aren’t interested in that, so we’ll see where that goes,” the South Dakota Republican said.

Thune said Republicans would still need to agree “on a number” and other components of it.

The Senate left on Thursday for a two-week recess.

Coronavirus cases have risen in states like Florida, Texas, Arizona and California — numerous states have paused or rolled back their reopening. The state of the economy over those two weeks is likely to impact the Senate Republican calculus.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., outlined three broad priorities for the next coronavirus relief bill: “Kids, jobs and health care.” He said he wants it to pass before August, which leaves just two weeks to act once the Senate returns from break on July 20.

Asked by Fox Business Network if he favors another round of direct payments, Trump said, “I do. I support it. But it has to be done properly.” He then segued to discussing unemployment insurance.

Asked again if he wants more direct payments, Trump responded, “I want the money getting to people to be larger so they can spend it,” before saying he doesn’t want it to be “an incentive not to go to work,” an apparent reference to the $600 weekly jobless benefit in the CARES Act that Republicans don’t want to extend.

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said the “direct stimulus checks are going to depend on how the economy is doing” and noted the “great unemployment numbers” of June, when the rate fell to 11.1 percent.

“So if it turns out the economy is recovering, that’s a good thing and direct stimulus checks may not be necessary,” he added.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said the Senate will “talk seriously and in earnest when we get back” about what might be in the next relief bill, mentioning the rising debt as a concern for the GOP.

“If there is another bill, it will be targeted,” Kennedy said. “Hopefully, we’ll learn from our first three bills in terms of what works and what doesn’t. The subtext, or the undercurrent, here at least on my side of the aisle is the fact that we owe $25 trillion and climbing.”

The first round of stimulus payments cost $293 billion, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Surveys show they’re popular among voters as the Nov. 3 general election nears. A CNBC/Change Research poll conducted in early May found 74 percent approval for sustained direct payments in the 2020 battleground states of Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

A FT-Peterson US Economic Monitor poll showed that 76 percent of Americans say an additional payment is “very” or “somewhat” important to them, while 24 percent said it was not. The results were nearly identical when limited to battleground states.

Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, who faces a competitive re-election battle this fall, was noncommittal when asked about another round of stimulus checks and direct deposits.

“We need to look at it, the jobs numbers. I want to see Iowa and how we’re doing at getting folks back to work. And we’ll take it from there,” she told NBC News.

Leigh Ann Caldwell contributed.

Source link

Continue Reading