Connect with us

Latest News

India launches rocket to far side of moon – just days after aborted take-off | World News



India’s space agency has launched an unmanned spacecraft to the far side of the moon just a week after aborting the mission due to a technical problem.

The Chandrayaan rocket lifted off from a site in Sriharikota, off the Bay of Bengal, as scheduled at 2.43pm local time (10.13am UK time) on Monday.

Named after the Sanskrit word for mooncraft, Chandrayaan is designed to land on the lunar south pole in September and send a rover to explore water deposits that were confirmed by a 2008 mission which orbited the moon.

The Indian Space Research Organisation's (ISRO) Chandrayaan-2 (Moon Chariot 2), on board the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV-mark III-M1), launches in Sriharikota in the state of Andhra Pradesh on July 22, 2019
The rocket was launched off the Bay of Bengal

Last week’s launch of the $141m (£113m) mission was called off less than an hour before lift-off due to a “technical snag”.

Media reports said it was aborted after a leak was discovered while filling helium in the rocket’s cryogenic engine.

The space agency neither confirmed nor denied the reports, saying instead that the problem had been identified and corrected.

The spacecraft is carrying an orbiter, a lander and a rover that will move around on the lunar surface for 14 earth days.

The Indian Space Research Organisation's (ISRO) Chandrayaan-2 (Moon Chariot 2), on board the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV-mark III-M1), launches in Sriharikota in the state of Andhra Pradesh on July 22, 2019
Chandrayaan is named after the Sanskrit word for mooncraft

It will take about 47 days to travel before landing on the moon in September.

India, which put a satellite into orbit around Mars in the nation’s first interplanetary mission in 2013 and 2014, plans to send its first manned spaceflight by 2022.

Source link

Latest News

Ex King of Belgium finally admits he fathered a daughter during extra-marital affair | World News



The former king of Belgium has finally admitted he is the father of a woman who had claimed she was born as a result of an extra-marital affair with her mother.

Albert II, who abdicated in 2013 for health reasons, had never publicly denied the claims of artist and sculptor Delphine Boel, 51, but had for years battled to avoid a DNA test.

King Albert II (r) abdicated in father of his son King Philippe on July 21, 2013
King Albert II (r) abdicated in favour of his son King Philippe on July 21, 2013

He finally gave in last year after an order from the Brussels Appeals court.

In a statement by the 85-year-old’s lawyers they said he admitted paternity as “scientific conclusions indicate that he is the biological father of Mrs Delphine Boel”.

On Monday Albert II said that he had decided to “to end with dignity this painful procedure”.

Ms Boel’s lawyer Marc Uyttendaele said that “her reaction was one of relief, emotion but also shows a wound that will not heal”.

Rumours about Albert and Ms Boel’s mother, Baroness Sybille de Selys Longchamps, had been around for years, but the news that the king may have had a child with her broke into the open when a biography of Albert’s wife, Queen Paola, was published in 1999.

In his Christmas message to the nation that year, he alluded to a past infidelity and said he and Queen Paola lived through a “crisis” in the late 1960s that almost wrecked their marriage, but they overcame their marital problems “a long while ago”.

Prince Albert of Belgium, later King Albert II and Princess Paola of Belgium (later Queen Paola) in 1959
The wedding of Prince Albert of Belgium, later King Albert II and Princess Paola of Belgium (later Queen Paola) in 1959

Albert II acceded to the Belgian throne in 1993 on the death of his older brother. He stepped down in July 2013 and automatically lost his immunity from prosecution. a privilege enjoyed by the reigning monarch.

The following year Ms Boel, who bears a striking resemblance to some members of the royal family, opened court proceedings to prove that Albert was her father.

She has always said she brought the paternity case due to anger since she was being cold-shouldered by the royal family.

Source link

Continue Reading

Latest News

Man charged with killing five of his own children when they were babies | US News



A man has been charged with killing five of his own children – none of them more than six months old.

Paul Perez, who is already behind bars in California, is accused of killing the infants between 1992 and 2001.

The remains of one of the siblings, three-month-old Nikko Lee Perez, were discovered by a fisherman in March 2007, submerged in an irrigation canal northwest of Sacramento.

Yolo County Sheriff’s Office said the baby was “found in a sealed container and weighed down with heavy objects”.

No information was discovered to further an investigation at the time – but in October, the infant was identified by DNA comparison.

Officials said: “It is now known that the baby boy was born on November 8 1996, in Fresno, California.”

Once they had the DNA information, investigators discovered that Nikko had siblings.

Police said one of them – Kato Allen Perez – was born in 1992 and is “known to be deceased”, while three other siblings are believed to have died.

Officials said the investigation is ongoing, but declined to say if Perez had other children or if the victims were born to more than one mother.

District Attorney Jeff Reisig said the investigation had “uncovered a deeply disturbing, chilling case of infanticide”.

He added: “Today we are announcing charges against Paul Perez for the serial murder of five of his own children, all babies.”

Ed Medrano, from the California Department of Justice, said the “allegations we are discussing today are senseless, evil and heartbreaking”.

Perez was arrested at a state prison days before he was expected to be released on unrelated charges, officials said.

Source link

Continue Reading

Latest News

Trump trial: What happened on day six as unlikely hero emerges for the Democrats | US News



Few expect Donald Trump to be removed from office come the end of his impeachment trial, but the Democrats have been given new fuel in their pursuit of sworn evidence from former US national security adviser John Bolton.

Here’s what you need to know from day six of the trial.

In a sentence

John Bolton, Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, claims the president directly withheld military aid to Ukraine in order to secure an investigation into his political opponents.

US President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with senior military leaders at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 9, 2018. At right is new National Security Advisor John Bolton.
President Donald Trump said Monday that "major decisions" would be made on a Syria response in the next day or two, after warning that Damascus would have a "big price to pay" over an alleged chemical attack on a rebel-held town.Trump condemned what he called a "heinous attack on innocent" Syrians in Douma, as he opened a cabinet meeting at the White House. 
 / AFP PHOTO / NICHOLAS KAMM        (Photo credit should read NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)
Donald Trump and his former national security adviser John Bolton

In a paragraph

Mr Bolton’s explosive allegation features in his new book, The Room Where It Happened. Pressure is now growing among Republicans to allow him to testify.

He’s an unlikely hero for Democrats, but they hope he could be a star witness and provide damming evidence of wrongdoing to help support their case of removing the president from office. Mr Trump plans to block him from talking on the grounds of protecting national security.

More from Trump Impeachment

That could set the stage for a potential showdown in the Supreme Court.

President Trump's lawyers say removing him would set a dangerous precedent in an election year.
They have begun delivering his defence in the Senate Impeachment trial. 

Mr Trump is accused of abusing his power and obstructing Congress, by allegedly putting pressure on Ukraine to investigate his political rival Joe Biden - a charge which he denies. 
Sky's Ian Woods reports from Washington.
Trump does not want John Bolton to testify

In 100 words

The reality is, there may now be enough new pressure on Senate Republicans to allow witnesses at the impeachment trial. Mr Bolton is not a peripheral figure. He worked closely with Mr Trump and he’s the first person to claim he was a direct eyewitness to the president tying aid to investigating Joe Biden.

Moderate Senators Mitt Romney and Susan Collins have already strongly signalled they would vote for witnesses. Democrats only need two more Republicans to potentially push it over the line.

But the story doesn’t end there. Mr Trump has made clear he will try to exert executive privilege and cite national security concerns to prevent Mr Bolton from talking.

His defence lawyers say Mr Bolton’s account doesn’t change any facts. But he is a key figure and his evidence explicitly speaks to the Democrats’ case. The White House will have a fight on its hands trying to stop the Senate from at least hearing him out.

In a quote

The reports about John Bolton’s book strengthen the case for witnesses and have prompted a  number of conversations around my colleagues.

Republican Senator Susan Collins

Tweet of the day

Source link

Continue Reading