Connect with us

Politics

Senate votes to block Saudi arms sales as Trump pledges veto

Published

on

WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Thursday to block the Trump administration from selling weapons to Saudi Arabia, launching a new challenge to President Donald Trump’s steadfast alliance with the country amid rising tensions in the Middle East.

Trump has promised to veto the legislation, which passed 53-45. The White House said stopping the sales “would send a message that the United States is abandoning its partners and allies at the very moment when threats to them are increasing.”

The Senate will hold two more votes Thursday on measures to stop the arms sales, which also are expected to pass. While the resolutions are also likely to be approved by the House, supporters of the measures are well short of having enough support to overcome Trump’s threatened veto.

The votes came against the backdrop of heightened U.S. tensions with Iran, spurred by the Islamic Republic’s downing of a U.S. drone. Trump declared Thursday that “Iran made a very big mistake,” and congressional leaders received a closed-door briefing on the situation at the Capitol.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo cited threats from Iran when declaring an emergency to approve the weapons sales in May. The Saudis have recently faced a number of attacks from Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.

“To reject these sales at this time and under these circumstances is to reward recent Iranian aggression and to encourage further Iranian escalation,” said Sen. Jim Risch of Idaho, the Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Risch added that blocking the sale would also “encourage miscalculation on the part of Iranians which will be disastrous.”

The $8 billion arms sale included precision guided munitions, other bombs and ammunition and aircraft maintenance support.

Opposition in Congress to closer U.S. Saudi ties escalated after the killing last year of U.S.-based columnist Jamal Khashoggi by agents of the kingdom. But a small group of lawmakers has been voicing concern about the Saudi-led coalition’s war in Yemen for years.

Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the war in Yemen was one reason for his opposition to the arms sales.

“These are bombs that we know have killed thousands of civilians in Yemen, patients in hospitals, children on school buses,” Menendez said.

The conflict in Yemen has killed thousands of civilians and left millions more are on the brink of starvation. Menendez called the humanitarian situation “an incomprehensible moral tragedy.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., delivered an impassioned speech from the Senate floor criticizing Saudi Arabia’s behavior as personally “disrespectful.”

“My relationship with Saudi Arabia is forever changed,” he said, accusing Riyadh of taking their relationship with the U.S. “for granted” and caring more about “maintaining power at all costs,” than the alliance.

“You’ve lost me, and that’s too bad,” he said.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Jo Swinson preparing to demand ANOTHER election as well as scrap Brexit -‘Lost the plot!’

Published

on

LIBERAL DEMOCRATS leader Jo Swinson has admitted she is willing to throw the country into further chaos in the coming months by demanding another general election if no party receives a majority in the upcoming national vote.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Washington state voters reject restoring affirmative action

Published

on

Washington voters have rejected a measure that would have overturned the state’s decadeslong ban on affirmative action — forcing state Democrats and advocates back to the drawing board.

“We’re obviously disappointed,” said April Sims, co-chair of Washington Fairness, the coalition that led the effort to approve the referendum. “But we remain committed to equity, opportunity and fairness — and that means a level playing field for everyone in Washington state.”

As mail-in ballots continued to be counted in the days after the general election on Nov. 5, advocates remained cautiously optimistic that the measure — which was narrowly trailing for much of the week — would experience a late boost.

On Tuesday night, with voters rejecting the measure by less than 1 percent, Washington Fairness conceded.

Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, said in a statement that the measure was an attempt to address “systemic inequities” that persist in work and education opportunities, and he will “continue to explore options that increase access to equitable opportunities and resources that reduce inequality.”

Earlier this year, the state’s Democratic-controlled Legislature pushed through an initiative to restore affirmative action shortly before the legislative session closed, but opponents moved quickly to block the law with a referendum.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

The political action committee Let People Vote opposed the Legislature’s move and collected over 200,000 signatures to place the issue on the Election Day ballot, handing its fate over to Washington voters.

John Carlson, a political commentator who spearheaded the campaign to strike down affirmative action in Washington over two decades ago, said that the measure’s passage would have been “unprecedented.”

“We’ve been moving in the direction of minimizing rather than magnifying race,” Carlson said in an interview before Election Day.

In 1998, Washingtonians passed an initiative that prohibited “preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin” within the public sector. It remains one of the nation’s longest-standing affirmative action bans.

Supporters of overturning the ban argued that since then, people of color have been discouraged from applying to public universities, and women and minorities have suffered from receiving fewer government contracts for their small businesses.

“This measure sent a strong message that Washington values fairness, and Washingtonians aren’t blind to the fact that the deck has been stacked against people of color and other marginalized individuals in our communities for decades, even centuries,” said Alison Holcomb, the political strategies director for ACLU of Washington.

However, Linda Yang, head of Washington Asians for Equality, voiced concern that the law would have adversely affected Washington’s Asian American community. She noted that in the absence of race-based affirmative action policies, 27 percent of the University of Washington freshmen enrolled this fall were Asian — compared with 8 percent of the statewide population.

“Our coalition of volunteers from across the political spectrum defeated [the measure] because voters didn’t want a new system of quotas based on race, nor did they want a massive new unaccountable government bureaucracy to implement it,” Yang said in a statement Tuesday night.

Asian Americans have recently become embroiled in the national debate surrounding affirmative action, with a high-profile lawsuit against Harvard alleging that its admissions process intentionally discriminated against Asian American applicants. In October, a federal judge ruled in favor of the university.

Currently, seven other states — Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire and Oklahoma — have bans on affirmative action. In 2014, California considered repealing its ban, but efforts ultimately tapered out amid fierce pushback from Asian Americans, among other groups.

Advocates of affirmative action remain hopeful that such policies will eventually be restored in Washington and in other states across the country.

“We ran a campaign that we are really proud of,” Sims said. “The results of this election show that nearly half of the folks who voted are ready to have that conversation, and we’re prepared to engage with them.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Jeremy Corbyn BLUNDER: Labour leader ‘did not know’ ISIS leader ‘blew himself up’

Published

on

JEREMY CORBYN has come under more fire for suggesting ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi should have been arrested and put on trial.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending