Connect with us

Politics

Death penalty repeal sweeping across states as both parties get on board

Published

on

Breaking News Emails

Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.

By Savannah Smith

New Hampshire state Rep. Renny Cushing opposed the death penalty before his father was murdered more than 30 years ago. He opposed it still in 2011, when his brother-in-law was shot and killed in Tennessee.

And in early March, he took to the House floor to encourage his colleagues to support his bill to abolish capital punishment in his home state — the bipartisan fruit of about six years of work in the Legislature, the Democratic lawmaker said, and one that comes 21 years since he sponsored his first piece of legislation aimed at repeal.

“To me, it was hanging on to my values as a victim,” Cushing, 66, told NBC News of his decadeslong effort.

“I know that in the aftermath of murder, having a ritual killing by government employees of an incapacitated prisoner doesn’t do anything to bring either my father or my brother-in-law back,” he added. “It just really fills another coffin and widens the pain.”

State Rep. Renny Cushing poses in front of the state capitol in Concord, N.H. on Oct. 24, 2013.Jim Cole / AP file

Repeal efforts such as Cushing’s are gathering steam in state legislatures across the country, mostly in places where the death penalty has been seldom issued in recent years, Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said, as lawmakers in both parties increasingly embrace change.

New Hampshire, where one person remains on death row, is just one of at least 15 states to take steps toward ending capital punishment so far this legislative session, according to the DPIC. That includes California, the state with the nation’s largest death row of 737 people, where Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom placed a moratorium on the state’s death penalty in early March. Already, 20 states and the District of Columbia have outlawed capital punishment, while three other states have a governor-issued moratorium.

“I think with the death penalty, we’ve crossed the tipping point on the question of innocence,” Dunham said of the uptick in state-level repeal efforts. “Every person who looks at the facts in good faith agrees that people who are innocent are at risk of being sentenced to death and being executed.”

Lawmakers and criminal justice reform advocates who have led the push for repeal say it’s an ineffective, medieval form of punishment that wastes taxpayer dollars, ensnares innocent people, discriminates against minorities and the poor while also violating moral or religious codes. Those opposed to such efforts argue that the death penalty is an effective deterrent to crime, necessary for public safety — and is the only punishment appropriate for the most heinous offenses.

In Colorado, where a bill to end the state’s use of the death penalty died last Tuesday in the state Senate, all three of the men on death row are from the same county. Colorado state Sen. Angela Williams, D-Denver, said that capital punishment discriminates not only by race, but also by place.

“The three men on death row are all African American. They all went to the same high school. They’re all from Arapahoe County. All of their cases were prosecuted in the 18th Judicial District,” Williams said in an interview prior to the bill being withdrawn from consideration. “As an African American woman who has worked on criminal justice reforms in the past, I am greatly concerned about the inequity of this application in Colorado.”

Still, divisions remain. Despite Democrats holding a majority in both the state Senate and House, it was unclear if there would have been enough votes for the repeal to pass, according The Denver Post. Those opposed to the proposal accused those in favor of rushing the process. And on Tuesday, one of the bill’s co-sponsors announced to the general assembly through tears that she was withdrawing the bill from consideration.

Prior to the bill being withdrawn, Dunham had pointed to Colorado as an example of the increasingly bipartisan nature of the debate surrounding the repeal of the death penalty.

“Just looking at Colorado, which has a Democratic majority,” Dunham said. “If this were a partisan issue, then that vote would have been rammed through already, but there are Democrats who are opposed to repeal.”

Those Democrats who oppose it include state Rep. Tom Sullivan, D-Arapahoe 37, who lost his son in the mass shooting in Aurora in 2012, and state Sen. Rhonda Fields, D-Arapahoe 29, whose son and his fiancée were murdered in 2005. Two of three men on death row in the state are there in connection to the killings.

Fields proposed that Colorado voters — not its lawmakers — decide whether or not to abolish the death penalty. “I believe we should trust Colorado voters to have the final say on such an important matter,” she tweeted March 11.

Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, said he supports the death penalty and has worked on cases supporting the rights of victims since the mid-1980s. He also believes that public opinion should be taken into account on this matter, particularly in California after a 2016 ballot poll indicated that the majority of voters supported the death penalty.

Repeal “was on the ballot and the people voted on it and the people made their decision,” Scheidegger said of the recent moratorium issued by Newsom. “The governor is spitting in the face of democracy to misuse the clemency power to effectively repeal a law. He has a constitutional duty to see that the law is faithfully executed and he is in gross violation of that duty.”

Colorado state Sen. John Cooke, R-Weld 13, said that as a former sheriff, preserving the option of capital punishment is necessary. “You see the things that people do to other people, there’s just pure evil out there. Those people need to pay the ultimate price for what they’ve done,” Cooke, who opposed the repeal bill’s advancement, said.

In Washington state, where Democrats have the majority in both chambers of the legislature, prospects for repeal appear brighter. After the state Supreme Court’s unanimous vote in October 2018 against capital punishment, in which the justices said it was “imposed in an arbitrary and racially biased manner,” a bill ending its use passed the state Senate earlier this year. The House Committee for Public Safety voted to advance the bill April 1, and the full House is expected to vote on it in the coming weeks. Gov. Jay Inslee, who is running for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, said that he would sign the bill, according to The Associated Press.

Hannah Cox, the national manager of Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty, said that while the issue of repealing the death penalty was once a partisan one, that’s changing.

It “was virtually unheard of in 2012 for a Republican lawmaker to sponsor repeal,” Cox said. This year, ten states have had Republican-sponsored legislation aimed at doing away with capital punishment, according to her grassroots advocacy group. That includes Georgia, where the bipartisan House Bill 702 was introduced on March 28 backed by the Ways and Means committee chairman and boasting two other GOP co-sponsors.

“Times are different. People are just recognizing the flaws in the criminal justice system and I think viewpoints are really, really different than they were in the ’90s on this issue,” Cox said.

Cushing noted that in New Hampshire, “there’s wide, broad bipartisan support for repeal of the death penalty.”

“The legislation in New Hampshire has always been bipartisan and it is this year again. The past two years, Republicans have taken the lead,” he added.

His bill passed the state House with a vote of 279-88 and Cushing expects it to be considered by the full Senate soon. Though Republican Gov. Chris Sununu has vowed to veto it — just like he rejected almost identical legislation last year — Cushing said he thinks the strong show of support in the House bodes well for the possibility of overriding a veto, which would need a two-thirds majority from both legislative chambers to pass.

“We’ll see,” he said.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Tory leadership race tracker: How Boris Johnson and Rory Stewart fared after BBC debate

Published

on

TORY leadership candidate Rory Stewart has suffered a massive drop in support following the BBC debate on Tuesday evening – whilst Boris Johnson is looking more popular than ever.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Hope Hicks testifies before House committee behind closed doors

Published

on

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s former aide Hope Hicks arrived on Capitol Hill Wednesday morning to testify behind closed doors before the House Judiciary Committee.

Democrats planned to focus their questions on what they say are five crimes of obstruction of justice established by the Mueller Report against Trump, as well as campaign finance violations involved with alleged election-year hush money payments.

Her appearance marks the first time a former Trump aide has come in to answer questions before that panel as part of Democrats’ obstruction of justice investigation. A transcript of the interview will be released, though it may not appear for several days.

Other issues Democrats plan to question Hicks about include Trump’s conduct and attitude towards former national security adviser Michael Flynn, Trump’s reaction when former Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation and the firing of former FBI Director James Comey, among others.

In a letter sent to Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., Tuesday evening, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone asserted that Hicks was not legally required to provide testimony regarding her time working in the White House.

“Ms. Hicks is absolutely immune from being compelled to testify before Congress with respect to matters occurring during her service as a senior adviser to the President,” he wrote.

Nadler dismissed those claims. “I reject that assertion” regarding blanket executive privilege, he said in a response released late Tuesday night, adding that after the panel poses questions to her, “we will address privilege and other objections on a question by question basis.”

Hicks’s testimony comes after the Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena last month for her appearance. She previously served as White House communications director and the White House director of strategic communications after a stint as a senior aide on Trump’s 2016 campaign.

The White House directed Hicks and another former White House aide earlier this month not to hand over any documents to the House Judiciary Committee related to their time at the White House.

Mike Memoli contributed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Commons erupts in fury as SNP's Ian Blackford brands Boris Johnson 'racist'

Published

on

SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford sparked fury in the House of Commons after he branded former foreign secretary Boris Johnson “racist”.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending