Connect with us

Politics

BREXIT LIVE: Top EU ‘influential’ seen in CRUNCH talks – May say we’re at ‘CRUCIAL STAGE’

Published

on

Politics

Trump snubs John McCain during bill signing intended to honor him

Published

on

Breaking News Emails

Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.

By Jonathan Allen

WASHINGTON — Congress wanted to honor the ailing Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. President Donald Trump did not.

In extended remarks during a visit to Fort Drum in upstate New York to sign the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 — this year’s version of an annual bill that sets defense policy — Trump chose not to mention the former prisoner of war and Senate Armed Services Committee chairman who is battling brain cancer. He even omitted McCain’s name when citing the title of the bill.

The two men have long been fierce critics of each other, with McCain calling Trump’s supporters “crazies” in 2015 and Trump retaliating by questioning whether McCain, who was subjected to torture in a Vietnamese prison camp, is really a “war hero” because “he was captured.”

The snub at Fort Drum, home to the combat aviation brigade of the Army’s 10th Mountain Division, did not escape the notice of McCain’s allies.

“For those asking did I expect Trump to be an a—— today. No more than I expected it to be Monday,” Mark Salter, McCain’s longtime aide, wrote on Twitter.

McCain’s condition — dire enough that a recent HBO documentary on him was titled “John McCain: For Whom the Bell Tolls” — has not stopped Trump from deriding the Arizona senator at political rallies. Though Trump does not use his name, he tells crowds that he would have been able to repeal Obamacare if not for a thumbs-down sign from one senator — McCain.

The senator’s own statement included Trump’s name in the headline and in a preamble written by staff. But the words attributed to McCain did not.

“I’m very proud that the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 has been signed into law,” he said.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Democratic candidates may find it hard to ‘change the channel’ from Trump

Published

on

Breaking News Emails

Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.

By Chuck Todd, Carrie Dann and Mark Murray

WASHINGTON — Over the weekend, the Democratic 2020 candidates again faced a familiar dichotomy as they tried to stand out in a crowded field: Pitching proactive messages of unity and optimism, while being reactive to the latest instance of President Trump elevating a particularly polarizing topic — in this case, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s comments about 9/11.

The three candidates who had campaign kickoff events in their hometowns over the weekend — Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg and Eric Swalwell — each pitched themselves as the optimistic antidote to the current president.

  • Booker, in Newark on Saturday, on social justice and “love”: “Newark, Brick City, taught me about that love. It’s not feel-good, easy-going love. It’s a strong, courageous love. The kind of love that serves, the kind of love that sacrifices. The kind of love that is essential to achieving justice.”
  • Swalwell, in California on Sunday, on the nation’s “promise” : “As someone who has benefited so profoundly from the promise of America, as someone who owes this country, this city everything, I’m asking you to help me create a country that fulfills that promise for all Americans.”
  • Buttigieg, in South Bend on Sunday, on “changing the channel” from the Trump era: “The horror show in Washington is mesmerizing, all-consuming. But starting today, we are going to change the channel. Sometimes a dark moment brings out the best in us, what is good in us, dare I say, what is great in us.”

That Buttigieg line about “changing the channel” sure sounds like an appealing one for the six-in-ten voters who express discomfort with Trump’s 2020 reelection bid.

But it won’t be easy to play on anyone’s turf but Trump’s. Just think about the other political news story that dominated the weekend: Democrats responding to Trump’s Friday tweet linking Rep. Ilhan Omar and the 9/11 attacks.

Here’s how some of the 2020 candidates responded:

  • Bernie Sanders: “Ilhan Omar is a leader with strength and courage. She won’t back down to Trump’s racism and hate, and neither will we. The disgusting and dangerous attacks against her must end.”
  • Beto O’Rourke: “This is an incitement to violence against Congresswoman Omar, against our fellow Americans who happen to be Muslim.”
  • Elizabeth Warren: “The President is inciting violence against a sitting Congresswoman—and an entire group of Americans based on their religion.”
  • Pete Buttigieg: “Now, a president uses that dark day to incite his base against a member of Congress, as if for sport. As if we learned nothing that day about the workings of hate.”
  • Kamala Harris: “For two years, this President has used the most powerful platform in the world to sow hate & division. He’s done it again. Putting the safety of a sitting member of Congress @IlhanMN at risk & vilifying a whole religion is beyond the pale.”

Diving into a controversy involving a prominent Muslim isn’t an unusual move for Trump; after all, he proposed a ban on Muslims entering the country, claimed to have seen “thousands” of Muslims cheering the 9/11 attacks, and posited that “Islam hates us.”

(And if you were wondering just how invested the White House is in talking about Omar, check out how Kellyanne Conway referenced her twice during an unrelated conversation about immigration policy with one of us on Sunday.)

But here’s our question: With a huge field of Democratic candidates seeking a breakout moment, what’s most effective? A change of channel and a return to normalcy? Or taking the fight to Trump, wherever he dictates it will be?

Trump campaign raises $30 million in first quarter

Speaking of Trump and 2020, we learned yesterday that the president’s reelection campaign raised $30 million in the first three months of the year and has more than $40 million cash on hand.

More, from NBC’s Monica Alba: “Combined with $46 million raised by the Republican National Committee, the full Trump re-election effort is expected to have a grand total of $82 million in the bank, with the campaign doubling what it had at the end of last year… Trump’s entire 2016 campaign brought in $333 million. At this pace, their second attempt will easily outraise that. Campaign manager Brad Parscale believes they may spend $1 billion this time around, which would be three times more than what it cost last cycle.”

Here’s how that $30 million Trump campaign haul compares to what we know so far from the 2020 Democrats ahead of today’s FEC deadline.

Total raised

  • Bernie Sanders: $18.2 million in 41 days
  • Kamala Harris: $12 million in 70 days
  • Beto O’Rourke: $9.4 million in 18 days
  • Pete Buttigieg: $7 million in 68 days
  • Elizabeth Warren: $6 million in 90 days
  • Amy Klobuchar: $5.2 million in 50 days
  • Cory Booker: $5 million-plus in 59 days
  • Kirsten Gillibrand: $3 million in 76 days
  • John Delaney: $12.1 million in 90 days* (but that includes a loan of $11.7 million from his own pocket. More on that below.)

That means that Democratic campaigns have raised a total of about $66 million in the first quarter, not counting Delaney’s self-funding.

As we wrote last week, Democratic fundraising has changed significantly over the last 12 years, with a new focus on small donors that’s yielding — for now — far more individual donors but less money overall for campaigns.

But don’t be surprised if that combined Trump/RNC number prompts hand-wringing from some Democratic strategists worried about building a war chest to compete with a GOP that’s still largely doing fundraising the old-fashioned way.

The Lid: Donor Dash

Don’t miss the pod from Friday, when we looked at how Democrats have pivoted away from the big bundler model of fundraising since the beginning of the Obama era.

2020 VISION: It’s FEC deadline day!

We already know a lot about the Democratic fundraising picture based on information the campaigns have individually released, but today, we get the receipts.

With campaigns due to submit their paperwork to the FEC by day’s end, we’ll be able to answer more questions about the money that candidates are raising — and spending.

Some of the questions we still have:

  • Who’s spending the most? Does anyone else come close to Elizabeth Warren’s more-than-85-percent burn rate?
  • Who has the most paid staff?
  • Are there any surprises among the second- and third- tier candidates? What about the candidates we haven’t heard from at all yet?
  • Who has the most donors who have already maxed out to the campaign?
  • What did day-by-day fundraising look like for candidates who had breakout moments, like Pete Buttigieg and his $7 million haul?

On the campaign trail today: Beto O’Rourke stumps in North Carolina… Bernie Sanders has an event with nurses in Pennsylvania and does a Fox News town hall that airs at 6:30pm ET… Elizabeth Warren and Jay Inslee are both in South Carolina… Cory Booker and Julian Castro are in Iowa… Eric Swalwell has a town hall in Nevada… and Howard Schultz has three events in Arizona.

Tweet of the Day

Data Download: The number of the day is… 3 percent

Three percent.

That’s the percentage of former Maryland Rep. John Delaney’s first quarter fundraising dollars that came from individual donors. The Democratic presidential hopeful technically raised $12.1 million during the first quarter of 2019, but $11.7 million of that came in the form of a loan to himself. After cutting that big check, Delaney’s campaign has $10.6 million in the bank.

Delaney raised just $73,000 in small-dollar donations between January and March, as he hopes to bolster his debate credentials and reach the party’s grassroots donor threshold. But this latest report confirms what we already knew about Delaney—the only thing making him competitive in the money chase right now is his own deep pockets.

We also got a glimpse of another Democratic campaign’s first quarter fundraising on Sunday when Kirsten Gillibrand’s spokeswoman announced the campaign raised $3 million and now has $10.2 million in cash on hand.

Unlike Delaney’s numbers, which come from his official Federal Election Commission report, the Gillibrand numbers are self-reported, so there’s still a lot we don’t know.

That top-line number of $3 million puts her behind every candidate we know of so far except Andrew Yang (and Delaney, but for that $11.7 million loan). But she still has a nice nest egg left over from her Senate campaign account, which can help keep the campaign above water as they kick things into gear.

ICYMI: News clips you shouldn’t miss

White House officials are eying new ways to target immigrants who overstay visas, according to The Wall Street Journal

Democrats want Stephen Miller to testify about his role in immigration policy controversies.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi downplayed the divisions in her party during an interview on CBS’ “60 Minutes”

The Department of Veterans Affairs is struggling to curb the rate of veteran suicides

Bernie Sanders is sparring with a liberal think tank he says is trying to “smear” his campaign.

And here’s other news that’s out there…

Trump agenda: DHS Drama

The New York Times looks at the White House’s purge of Homeland Security officials meant to boost hardline policies on immigration

Former Federal Reserve officials warn President Trump against politicizing the central bank

The Washington Post reports the Trump administration’s Middle East peace plan likely won’t include a sovereign Palestinian state

2020: Tax Day

Democratic presidential candidates are defending Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar against conservative criticism of her 9/11 comments

Kamala Harris released 15 years of tax returns

Can Bernie Sanders win over Trump voters?



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Brexit timeline: What happens next? KEY dates to watch as the UK heads for EU elections

Published

on

BREXIT has been delayed again, resetting the agenda and shuffling the timeline for the UK’s departure once more. So what is happening next?

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending