Connect with us

Politics

Fox News host Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s mystery client

Published

on

It is not known why Cohen was representing Hannity.

Hannity addressed the news on his AM radio show, claiming that while he never retained Cohen in the “traditional” sense, they still had attorney-client privilege.

“Michael never represented me in any matter, I never retained him in the traditional sense as retaining a lawyer, I never received an invoice from Michael, I never paid legal fees to Michael,” Hannity said, before adding, “We definitely had attorney client privilege because I asked him for that but, you know, he never sent me a bill or an invoice or did I actually officially retain him.”

Hannity also said that he “might have handed him 10 bucks.”

Later Monday afternoon, Hannity tweeted that he “assumed” his conversations with Cohen “were confidential, but to be absolutely clear they never involved any matter between me and a third-party.” He said the discussions were “almost exclusively about real estate.”

The TV host has been a consistent backer of Trump, both on-air and off, and has repeatedly blasted Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. He has also frequently defended Cohen in the days since the FBI raided Cohen’s home and office.

“As I have been warning, Mueller is out to get the president and it appears at any cost,” Hannity said last Monday on his Fox News program, hours after news of the raid broke.

“Now keep in mind, Cohen was never part of the Trump administration, or the Trump campaign,” he said then. “This is now officially an all-hand-on-deck effort to malign, and if possible, impeach the president of the United States.”

On the next evening’s show, he slammed the FBI’s raid as “an unprecedented abuse of power.” The next day, he called it “highly questionable.”

Until now, Hannity had not disclosed that he had a relationship with Cohen during his radio show or television program.

Ethics experts immediately questioned why he, or Fox News, hadn’t previously revealed the tie.

“Why doesn’t @FoxNews have a conflict of interest policy requiring Hannity to disclose his personal interest in the Cohen search when commenting on it?” tweeted Walter Shaub, the former director of the independent Office of Government Ethics.

A spokesperson for Fox News did not immediately respond to questions from NBC News about the relationship between Hannity and Cohen.

Monday’s legal proceedings stemmed from a motion for a temporary restraining order under which Cohen had sought to stop federal investigators from reviewing materials seized in a search warrant last week.

Wood denied that motion during Monday’s hearing.

She also did not rule out the possibility of using a “privilege team,” also known as a “taint team,” which would review which of the seized materials are considered privileged through attorney-client privilege, and which materials can be turned over to the potential trial prosecutors and federal agents.

“I have faith in the Southern District Attorney’s Office. Their integrity is unimpeachable. I think a taint team is a viable option,” Wood said.

Until Wood makes a decision on a “taint team,” the U.S. government will have to produce the documents they seized on a rolling basis to opposing counsel, meaning they will have to share with Cohen’s team what they found.

During the hearing, Trump’s attorney, Joanna Hendon, said that Trump, as the “owner” of the privilege, is entitled to first review of the materials seized from Cohen.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas McKay responded that “just because he (Cohen) has a powerful client doesn’t make him entitled to special treatment.”

Monday’s hearing included direct references to Trump by lawyers for the government. At one point, McKay said that “inflammatory remarks about the case” made by Cohen and by Trump were “drumming up” media attention.

The specific focus of the investigation and possible federal crimes have not been disclosed by the U.S. attorney’s office, but in a filing on Friday they do confirm Cohen is under federal criminal investigation. Federal prosecutors said in a court filing Friday the investigation that led them to raid Cohen’s offices “largely centers on his personal business dealings” and has been going on for months. However, Wood said Monday that the search warrant would remain sealed.

Stormy Daniels, who claims she had an affair with Trump in 2006, attended the court proceedings.

FBI agents seized documents and devices in raids last week on Cohen’s office and hotel room, seeking information about payments made to Daniels shortly before the 2016 election. A letter that Cohen’s lawyers sent to the court on Monday morning states that more than a dozen electronic devices and other items were seized.

Daniels alleges she had a sexual encounter with Trump in 2006. The White House and Cohen have denied that claim.

Cohen, 51, has denied wrongdoing. Trump has blasted the raid, calling it “an attack on our country” while reiterating his view that Mueller’s investigation is a “witch hunt” and a “disgrace.”

Trump last week broke his silence on the Daniels case, saying he was not aware of the payment made by Cohen to the porn actress just days before he was elected. The president also said he did not know where the $130,000 came from. Cohen has said it came out of his own pocket.



Source link

Politics

Brexit deal on BRINK: EU fears UK will leave with no deal ahead of last-ditch crunch talks

Published

on

EUROCRATS are working on the assumption Britain will quit the European Union without a Brexit deal, it has emerged.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Bumble Bee responds to Trump’s claim about protesters throwing cans of tuna

Published

on

Bumble Bee Seafoods on Tuesday responded to President Donald Trump’s fishy claim that protesters used cans of tuna to chuck at law enforcement amid civil unrest prompted by the deaths of Black Americans by police.

“They go out and buy tuna fish and soup. You know that right? … Because they throw it, they throw it, it’s the perfect weight — tuna fish,” Trump said at a rally in Pittsburgh on Tuesday. “They can really rip it, right? And that hits you. No, it’s true. Bumble Bee brand tuna.”

There have been no media reports of police being hit with cans of tuna. Bumble Bee Seafoods responded to the claim in a tweet on Tuesday.

“Eat em. Don’t throw em,” the company said on its official Twitter.

In 2018, The company said Trump’s tariffs on Chinese tuna would be “devastating” for the business.

There have been nationwide protests following the killings of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor and the shooting of Jacob Blake, a 29-year-old Black man, in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Trump has used his re-election rallies to spread falsehoods about the protests and boast his law and order message and his pledge to quell the unrest in cities.

He claimed at Tuesday’s rally and others that mostly Democratic cities have been overrun by “anarchists.” Though police have violently clashed with demonstrators, many of the protests have remained largely peaceful.

On Monday, the Justice Department released a list of cities that it has deemed “anarchist jurisdictions” under Trump’s instructions this month to review federal funding for local governments in places where violence or vandalism has occurred during protests.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

EU crisis: Shock member state set to leave bloc after Brexit after issue ignored by bloc

Published

on

A BREXITEER has predicted one surprising nation will push to leave the EU after Brexit due to frustration with the bloc.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending