Connect with us

Latest News

Bill Cosby’s main accuser, Andrea Constand, takes the stand at end of dramatic first week of retrial

Published

on

Her testimony concluded a dramatic week at the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, where six accusers, including former supermodel Janice Dickinson, testified before the jury that Cosby drugged and sexually assaulted them.

Cosby’s first trial ended in a deadlocked jury, and his retrial is the first big celebrity court case since the #MeToo movement exposed scores of men in the media, entertainment and business worlds as sexual harassers.

He faces three counts of aggravated indecent assault, with each of three counts carrying a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.

Cosby has repeatedly denied all the allegations against him, and has said the sexual encounter with Constand was consensual.

Cosby is not charged in any of the assaults alleged by the five women, who are being allowed to testify to give the prosecution a chance to establish that the assault alleged by Constand fits a pattern.

A spokesman for Cosby, Andrew Wyatt, told reporters this week that the testimony of the additional women testifying to accusations unrelated to the criminal charges at issue was a “prosecution by distraction.”

Constand, a former professional basketball player, had a towering presence when she walked into the courtroom wearing a white suit. She appeared calm on the witness stand, smiling at times.

She described how she first met Cosby at a Temple University women’s basketball game in the fall of 2002. He soon began calling Constand ask her questions about the women’s basketball team, who paid for things, and generally what was happening with Temple University’s sports programs.

She said she began to discuss her personal life with him, including her aspirations to be a broadcast news sports commentator. He began to invite her to dinner a his home, and out with friends to a concert and the Foxwoods Resort Casino in Connecticut.

 Bill Cosby smiles as he departs his sexual assault trial at the Montgomery County Courthouse on April 13, 2018 in Norristown, Pa. Matt Slocum / AP

She said before the alleged instance of assault, she visited Cosby’s home for dinner. Once he touched her thigh; another time, he tried to unzip her pants when sat next to her on the couch in his living room.

“I could feel him trying to get a hold of my zipper,” she said. “He never went inside of me, he stopped before he got to that. I leaned forward and said I didn’t come here for that, and he complied.”

She said she thought he had gotten the message that she did not want a romantic relationship and continued to spend time with him.

A few months later, in January 2004, she went to his home again. On that night she was making a decision about whether to leave her job and sought out Cosby’s advice. It was then, she alleges, Cosby offered her brandy and three circular blue pills, which made her feel wobbly and she began slurring her words. He allegedly guided her to his living room couch.

“He placed me on the sofa and put a pillow under my head and said, ‘Just relax there.’ I was very scared. I didn’t know what was happening with my body,” she said.

The next thing she remembered, she said was being jolted awake and feeling Cosby’s fingers in her vagina and touching her breast. He also placed her hand on his penis while he masturbated.

Prosecutor Kristen Feden asked Constand, “Were you able to tell him to stop?”

“No,” Constand replied. “ I wanted it to stop and I was trying to get my hands and legs to move,” but, she added, “I was limp and I could not fight him off.”

“I was humiliated, in shock and confused,” she said.

 Bill Cosby leaves court waving from his SUV outside the Montgomery County Courthouse on April 13, 2018 in Norristown, Pa. Corey Perrine / Pool via AP

She later recalled waking up with her bra around her neck and disheveled. She recalled him wearing a robe with slippers. He did not say anything to her, but she recalled seeing “a muffin and tea on the table.” She remembered taking a sip of the tea and left his home. She said she had not totally understood what had happened until she was driving home.

Earlier in the day, she confirmed that she had received a previously undisclosed $3,380,000 million civil settlement from Cosby in 2006, which is admissible as evidence in the criminal trial.

On cross-examination, defense attorney Tom Mesereau drilled into why she continued to spend time with Cosby even after he made advances toward her. Constand said she was confused and that his advances, at the time, seemed innocent.

“What did you think, when he reached over and touched your thigh?” Mesereau asked.

“I was embarrassed,” she said. “I thought it was kind of silly.”

“Nothing suggested that he was physically attracted to you?,” he continued.

“No, he was married man, I didn’t think he would be attracted to me,” Constand replied.

He pressed on: “First time, thigh and waist, second time he tried to put his hands in your pants and still, you didn’t think he was interested in you physically or sexually?”

“I didn’t know what to think, I thought he made a pass at me,” she said.

Source link

Latest News

Piers Morgan joining new channel talkTV where he will present ‘global show’ | Ents & Arts News

Published

on

Piers Morgan has revealed his next presenting job will be for new television channel talkTV – which is being set up by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp.

The company, which will launch its new service next year, said Morgan’s nightly show will be broadcast in the UK, the US and Australia.

He left Good Morning Britain earlier in the year, after criticising Harry and Meghan’s comments in an interview they gave with Oprah Winfrey, saying he did not believe some of the things they said, particularly around mental health.

The show was recently cleared by Ofcom, after tens of thousands of complaints were made about it.

Talking about his new role, Morgan said: “I’m thrilled to be returning to News Corp, which is where I began my media career more than 30 years ago.

“Rupert Murdoch has been a constant and fearless champion of free speech and we are going to be building something new and very exciting together.

“I want my global show to be a fearless forum for lively debate and agenda-setting interviews, and a place that celebrates the right of everyone to have an opinion, and for those opinions to be vigorously examined and challenged.

“I’m also delighted to become a columnist for The Sun and the New York Post, two brilliantly successful and popular newspaper brands.

“I’m going home and we’re going to have some fun.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘A good day for free speech’ – Piers Morgan

Executive chairman of News Corp, Rupert Murdoch, added: “Piers is the broadcaster every channel wants but is too afraid to hire. Piers is a brilliant presenter, a talented journalist and says what people are thinking and feeling.”

In the past, Morgan has been hired by ITV, CNN and NBC in various presenting roles.

News Corp said its new channel will “offer a mix of programming from our stable of household brands, proper hourly news bulletins, documentaries, entertainment and more”.

The company already owns established news brands such as The Times and The Sun newspapers, as well as a number of radio stations such as Virgin and talkSport.

News Corp had previously scrapped plans for a linear news channel, and instead decided to focus on streaming its radio brands online, while rival GB News pushed ahead with its launch.

Responding to News Corp’s announcement, GB News tweeted: “Congratulations to Piers Morgan.

“We love competition. Bring it on!”

In the US, Morgan’s show will be carried on Fox Nation, while Sky News Australia will broadcast it down under.



Source link

Continue Reading

Latest News

China says AUKUS submarine deal ‘highly irresponsible’ and ‘intensifies the arms race’ | World News

Published

on

A new security deal between the United States, Britain, and Australia in the Indo-Pacific “severely damages regional peace” and “intensifies the arms race”, China has said.

On Wednesday, the three western powers announced they will establish a security partnership that will help Australia acquire US nuclear-powered submarines.

In Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian condemned the move and said: “The US, the UK and Australia’s cooperation in nuclear submarines severely damages regional peace and stability, intensifies the arms race, and jeopardises the international efforts in promoting the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘AUKUS alliance will bring us closer than ever’

“The US and UK’s action of exporting highly sensitive nuclear submarine technology once again proves that they are using nuclear exports as a tool for geopolitical games and adapts double standards.

“This is a highly irresponsible act.”

It comes as France accused US President Joe Biden of stabbing it in the back and acting like predecessor Donald Trump after Paris was snubbed from a $40bn (£29bn) defence deal it had signed with Australia.

The deal, dubbed AUKUS, will see Australia scrap its 2016 agreement with French shipbuilder Naval Group to build a new fleet to replace its ageing Collins submarines.

“This brutal, unilateral and unpredictable decision reminds me a lot of what Mr Trump used to do,” foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said on franceinfo radio.

“I am angry and bitter. This isn’t done between allies.”

“It’s a stab in the back. We created a relationship of trust with Australia and that trust has been broken,” he added.

He had previously said in a statement the “choice to exclude a European ally and partner such as France” was something the country “can only note and regret”.

London, Canberra and Washington have said they will seek to collaborate in cyber, quantum technologies and artificial intelligence, as well as other underwater capabilities.

Defence Secretary Ben Wallace told Sky News on Thursday: “We have no intention of doing anything to antagonise the French – the French are some of our closest military allies in Europe, we are sizable and comparable forces and we do things together.”

He added: “The French were contracted to deliver diesel submarines and the Australians took a decision they wanted to switch out of that and into nuclear.

“Each country has to make those choices in their own national security interests.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Did Biden forget Australian PM’s name?

Nuclear-powered submarines are superior to their diesel counterparts as they can operate more quietly and stay underwater for longer.

How the collaboration will work, what it will cost, how many boats will be built, where and which companies will be involved has not yet been revealed.

However, just two weeks ago the Australian defence and foreign ministers had reconfirmed the deal to their French counterparts.

But the agreement had been beset with issues and delays, due to Canberra’s requirement the majority of manufacturing and components be sourced locally.

Mr Biden said France remained a “key partner in the Indo-Pacific zone”, while Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison said his country looked forward to continuing to work “closely and positively” with the French, adding: “France is a key friend and partner to Australia and the Indo-Pacific.”

In a joint statement, the pair along with Britain’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson said: “The endeavour we launch today will help sustain peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.

“For more than 70 years, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the US have worked together, along with other important allies and partners, to protect our shared values and promote security and prosperity. Today, with the formation of AUKUS, we recommit ourselves to this vision.”

Although the word “China” was not mentioned specifically, the predominant security and defence challenge in the region is the rise of an increasingly assertive, authoritarian Beijing.

Source link

Continue Reading

Latest News

Cyprus: British woman convicted of lying about gang rape claim is ‘happy’ after lodging Supreme Court appeal | World News

Published

on

A British woman, who was convicted of lying about being gang-raped in Cyprus, is “happy” after lodging an appeal in the Cypriot Supreme Court.

The then 19-year-old, from Derby, was given a suspended four-month jail term in 2020 after a judge found her guilty of public mischief following a trial.

The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, told police she was attacked by up to 12 Israeli tourists in a hotel room, during a party in Ayia Napa on 17 July 2019, but was charged after signing a retraction statement 10 days later.

A British teenager, convicted of falsely accusing a group of Israelis of gang-rape, covers her face as she arrives at the Famagusta District Court in Paralimni
Image:
Her lawyers are seeking to have her conviction overturned by the Supreme Court in Cyprus

The now 21-year-old university student has maintained she was pressured by officers to withdraw the allegation and has vowed to clear her name having flown back to the UK after being sentenced.

Her team of English and Cypriot lawyers have took the case to the Supreme Court, which is in Cyprus’s capital, Nicosia, on Thursday.

They argued the conviction is unsafe and are seeking to set it aside.

The woman is not attending the hearing, which is in front of a three-panel judge, including English-born president Persefoni Panayi.

Speaking after the hearing, her English barrister, Lewis Power QC, said: “I think it was a very fruitful hearing where the court asked very poignant questions, considered the legal arguments and identified the points which will ultimately decide this appeal.

Protesters supporting the woman outside court
Image:
Protesters have shown their support for the woman through her court hearings

“We cannot pre-empt the decision of the court, but we were glad to see the court had given much thought and considerable consideration to a very, very difficult case.”

Another member of the legal team, Michael Polak, added: “Without wanting to pre-judge the decision of the Supreme Court, we feel we were happy with the way proceedings went today and the way the judges engaged with our arguments.”

The Supreme Court judges reserved judgment on the appeal.

The woman’s lawyers submitted a written document of around 150 pages, which they will expand on in oral arguments based on transcripts from the trial.

Her legal team argued the retraction, which formed the basis of the prosecution case, should never have been admitted into evidence because it was made by a vulnerable teenager who spent almost seven hours in a police station without legal representation.

The woman's charge carries a maximum penalty of a year in jail or a fine.
Image:
The woman was given a four-month suspended sentence in 2020

The decision could take between three to six months, although the lawyers hope it could come sooner.

Before the hearing started, Mr Power said: “The young woman’s story has reverberated around the world since it hit the headlines in 2019.

“It has been both shocking and distressing and has for her been deeply harrowing, humiliating and personally intrusive.

“Today though, we hope, the Supreme Court of Cyprus (will ensure) this girl can free herself from the shackles of an unjust conviction, which has tarnished her young life.”

If the appeal is unsuccessful, the woman’s legal team plan to take the case to the European Court of Human rights, which they say found against Cyprus after a teenager was brought into a police station in Limassol and separated from his father before confessing to murder without a lawyer.

The woman received a four-month jail term, suspended for three years
Image:
Her lawyers say they will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights if they are unsuccessful

The 12 men accused of rape in 2019 were aged between 18 and 20 at the time and were arrested.

They denied any wrongdoing and were freed, before returning home.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending