Connect with us

Politics

Trump claims women ‘are raped at levels never seen before’ during immigrant caravan

Published

on

Trump began the week warning of dangerous “caravans” of immigrants headed for the U.S. border with Mexico. On Tuesday, he tweeted about “the big Caravan of People from Honduras, now coming across Mexico and heading to our ‘Weak Laws’ Border.”

Trump used the event in West Virginia Thursday, billed as a tax reform roundtable, to discuss border security, immigration and voter fraud. He also took the opportunity to hammer West Virginia’s Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin, who is facing a tough re-election fight this year.

Trump’s central message this week has focused on his efforts to beef up border security and illegal immigration.

“It’s amazing what other countries put into the (immigration) system,” the president said. “They don’t put their good ones.”

Related

Trump touched upon some of the central themes he campaigned on during the 2016 election, reverting to old form when he tossed his “boring” prepared remarks behind him, opting instead to wing it.

The president celebrated his administration’s tax plan, saying he chose to call it a “tax cut” plan since that language would resonate more with average Americans than tax reform.

Manchin struck back later in a statement, saying he would avoid the “political posturing back and forth” and blaming the tax plan Trump had traveled to the state to promote for rising insurance premiums.

Trump also hammered California, which has sued the federal government dozens of times since he took office, on issues ranging from voting rights to immigration.

“In many places, like California, the same person votes many times,” he said. “They always like to say, ‘Oh, that’s a conspiracy theory.’ Not a conspiracy theory, folks. Millions and millions of people.”

Trump has not offered any evidence to support his longtime claim that millions of immigrants voted illegally in the 2016 election.

With his White House victory rarely far from his mind, Trump praised West Virginia for its support.

“I just want to congratulate the state of West Virginia because I’m so proud of you,” he said of the state where he defeated Clinton by more than 40 points. “You were with me from day one. From day one.”

Source link

Politics

Brexit breakthrough as trade talks could enter crucial new phase next week

Published

on

BREXIT negotiations could go into a crucial “tunnel” phase as early as Monday as a trade deal looks to be within reach.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Supreme Court sides mostly with Republicans in last-minute voting cases

Published

on

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has faced a stream of last-minute appeals over election procedures since the spring, and most of the time it has rejected calls to allow less restrictive voting measures despite the pandemic.

That has generally meant that Republicans prevailed in seeking to block changes that would make it easier to vote, especially in casting mail-in ballots. Of 11 election-related cases filed as emergency appeals since April, Republican interests won in eight.

The court rejected Democratic efforts to lift an age eligibility requirement for mail ballots in Texas, or allow curbside voting and waive the witness requirement for mail ballots in Alabama, or suspend the witness requirement in South Carolina. And it put a hold on lower court orders that would have made it easier to get initiative measures on the ballot in Idaho and Oregon.

“I think a deference to the states is at work here,” said Edward Foley, an expert on election law at Moritz College of law at The Ohio State University.

That could explain why the court reached opposite conclusions on mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

On Oct. 20, the court rebuffed a Republican attempt to block a ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that allows mail ballots to be counted if they arrive up to three days after election day. By contrast, the court granted a GOP request to block an extension on the mail ballot deadline that was ordered by a federal court in Wisconsin during the primary.

“The Pennsylvania case was coming from the state’s own judiciary rather than a federal court,” Foley said, and the state’s top election official was not supporting the Republicans.

Paul Smith of the Campaign Legal Center in Washington, who frequently argues election cases in federal court, agrees.

“There seems to be some feeling on the Supreme Court that state election officials should be left alone to make their judgment,” he said.

At the same time, he added, that has tended to allow Republicans to prevail, limiting voting opportunities.

In August, the Supreme Court denied an effort by Republicans to block lower court rulings that suspended the witness requirement for mail ballots in Rhode Island, but state officials supported that rule change making voting easier. And in October, the court rejected a Republican appeal seeking to block ranked-choice voting in Maine. There, too, the change was endorsed by the top court in the state, not by a federal judge.

Two more rulings could come at any time ahead of Election Day Nov. 3 from the U.S. Supreme Court, on Republican efforts to block lower court rulings that extend the mail ballot deadline in the presidential battleground states of Wisconsin and North Carolina.

Judge Amy Coney Barret’s confirmation by the full Senate is expected Monday, so she could jump in and vote on any of those pending emergency appeals, as well as others that will undoubtedly come before Election Day.

The vote in the Pennsylvania case was 4-4, one vote short of the number needed to grant a stay of a lower court ruling. Barrett’s arrival removes the possibility of further ties.

A third factor may also be at work in the court’s unwillingness to allow last-minute rule changes.

When the court ruled for Republicans in the South Carolina case, maintaining the signature requirement for mail ballots, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that the Supreme Court has for years tended to disfavor such changes.

“This court has repeatedly emphasized that federal courts ordinarily should not alter state election rules in the period close to an election,” he wrote.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Michael Portillo issues damning prediction for US election as Biden races ahead in polls

Published

on

MICHAEL PORTILLO said there can be no real winner in the US election, as he hit out at both Joe Biden and Donald Trump ahead of the crunch presidential vote.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending