Connect with us

Latest News

Low-crime village bans military-style guns, citing Parkland and other mass shootings

Published

on

Less than a week after that attack, Deerfield Mayor Harriet Rosenthal asked the village attorney to research the possibility of an assault weapons ban. Mimicking an ordinance passed in neighboring Highland Park in 2013, the Deerfield measure, approved Monday, outlaws many types of semiautomatic rifles, pistols and shotguns, along with magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Those who have these weapons have 60 days to sell or surrender them under the threat of $1,000-a-day fines and confiscation by police.

 AR-15 rifles are displayed for sale at the Guntoberfest gun show in Oaks, Pennsylvania on Oct. 6, 2017. Joshua Roberts / Reuters file

That word, confiscation, is an emotional trigger for many gun-rights advocates, and it comes up frequently in a lawsuit filed Thursday by a Deerfield gun owner, the Illinois State Rifle Association and the Second Amendment Foundation.

The lawsuit alleges that the Deerfield ordinance violated a 2013 state law that sought to avoid a patchwork of gun regulations throughout Illinois. The law, known as a “pre-emption statute,” set statewide regulations, grandfathered existing local bans and gave municipalities a short window to enact new ones before prohibiting them altogether.

Related

Deerfield’s village board says it is in compliance with the state law because its ban is actually a revision of a regulation on gun storage passed during that 10-day window.

Opponents also say there’s little logic to the ban other than making a political statement.

“They just did this because they wanted to do it,” said Richard Pearson, executive director of the Illinois State Rifle Association.

Mark Shaw, chairman of the Lake County Republican Party, who lives in neighboring Lake Forest, said he has a concealed-carry permit for his Smith & Wesson handgun, which he outfits with a 12-round magazine. He said the Deerfield ban seemed arbitrary, and risked having gun owners unknowingly break the law while visiting the village.

“You can see what kind of impact that would put on free flow of commerce between these communities,” Shaw said.

Rosenthal and Deerfield Police Chief John Sliozis declined to answer questions about the ban on Friday, referring those making inquiries to official statements made earlier in the week.

The ordinance itself says the ban may “increase the public’s sense of safety” in public places and may help keep a mass shooting from happening in Deerfield. It also says the measure would help communicate “that assault weapons should have no role or purpose in civil society in the Village of Deerfield.” And it notes that the 2013 ban in Highland Park has survived legal challenges.

 AR-15 rifles are on display during the Nation’s Gun Show in Chantilly, Virginia on Nov. 18, 2016. Alex Wong / Getty Images file

The morning after the ordinance passed, Rosenthal said in a press release she hoped the local measure “helps spur state and national leaders to take steps to make our communities safer.”

The police department released a statement saying the ordinance would “initially be enforced primarily through education and voluntary compliance” and that any confiscations would adhere to state and federal laws. “Members of the Department will not go ‘door to door’ to ensure compliance,” the statement said.

Gun-law experts said the lawsuit’s focus on the 2013 state law, rather than larger constitutional issues, is opponents’ best bet at defeating the Deerfield ordinance.

“Does calling the ordinance an ‘amendment’ make it so?” asked Eric Ruben, a fellow at the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice in New York, in an email. “Or will the court try to draw a line beyond which an ‘amendment’ becomes a new ordinance? These are just two of the difficult questions the court will need to decide.”

David Kopel, a gun-rights advocate and research director at the Independence Institute, a libertarian think tank in Denver, agreed.

“I think Deerfield has some real problems on that,” Kopel said. “They have some specious arguments about why the pre-emption statute doesn’t apply to their ban.”

Source link

Latest News

Caroline Crouch: Hundreds attend funeral of British woman killed in Greece burglary | World News

Published

on

The funeral of a British woman killed in the presence of her baby daughter in Greece has taken place in front of hundreds of mourners.

Friends and relatives of Caroline Crouch travelled to the island of Alonissos on Friday, where she was laid to rest at a hilltop cemetery.

Ms Crouch, 20, was asleep with her Greek husband Charalambos Anagnostopoulos, 32, and their baby at their home near Athens on Tuesday when burglars broke in.

The mother-of-one was tied up and strangled and the family dog also killed, while Mr Anagnostopoulos was bound and gagged in a separate room.

Caroline Crouch with her husband
Image:
Caroline Crouch (right) with her husband Charalambos Anagnostopoulos
The funeral took place on the Greek island of Alonissos
Image:
The funeral took place on the Greek island of Alonissos

Their baby was not harmed but witnessed her mother’s death.

Ms Crouch’s parents David Crouch and Susan Dela Cuesta were overcome with grief ahead of the service and were supported by friends and family.

Shops closed on the island in a mark of respect, as a black hearse arrived at the Agia Paraskevi church covered in white roses.

Mr Anagnostopoulos helped his daughter lay a flower on her mother’s coffin.

Mourners are pictured wearing masks to the service
Image:
Mourners are pictured overcome with grief
The hearse is pictured arriving at the funeral
Image:
The hearse is pictured arriving at the funeral

Ms Dela Cuesta, who is originally from the Philippines, had travelled with her daughter’s body from the family home to the island.

The burglars, who escaped with cash and jewellery, have still not been caught and a £260,000 reward is being offered for information by the Greek government.

Ms Crouch’s widower managed to free himself from his bonds and call the police, but it was too late to save his wife.

A flower was placed on Ms Crouch's coffin
Image:
A flower was placed on Ms Crouch’s coffin by her baby daughter

He told local media this week: “I wish no one ever goes through what we went through last night. It was a nightmare.

“We begged the thieves not to harm us. We told them where the money was and asked them to leave us alone. The police will catch them.”

Mr Anagnostopoulos said at one point he heard the burglars say to his partner “tell us where the money is, we will kill the baby”, according to Greek media.

Source link

Continue Reading

Latest News

Kabul: Imam among 12 worshippers killed in Afghanistan mosque bombing during Friday prayers | World News

Published

on

A bomb ripped through a mosque in Kabul during Friday prayers, killing 12 worshippers including the imam, Afghan police have said.

A further 15 people were wounded – including at least one child according to eye witnesses – in the explosion which happened in Shakar Dara district, in the north of the capital.

The imam, named as Mofti Noman, may have been a target, an initial police investigation suggests, said Afghan police spokesman Ferdaws Faramarz.

The bombing happened on the second of a three-day ceasefire announced by the Taliban to mark the Muslim holiday Eid al-Fitr.

Journalists filming and taking pictures in the aftermath of the explosion Pic: AP
Image:
It is the latest in a surge in violence as US and NATO troops begin their final withdrawal from the war-torn country. Pic: AP

The Afghan government also agreed to abide by the truce.

No one has immediately claimed responsibility for the bombing.

But it is the latest in a surge in violence as US and NATO troops begin their final withdrawal from the war-torn country, after two decades of conflict.

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid condemned the mosque attack and denied any insurgent connection.

Security personnel arrive at the explosion site in Kabul Pic: AP
Image:
Security personnel arrive at the explosion site in Kabul. Pic: AP
A witness inspects debris from the explosion Pic: AP
Image:
No one has immediately claimed responsibility for the bombing. Pic: AP

He accused Afghanistan‘s intelligence agency of being responsible for the blast.

One worshipper, Muhibullah Sahebzada, said he had just arrived at the building when the explosion happened.

He told of how he heard children screaming as smoke filled the mosque and described seeing several bodies on the floor.

It appeared that an explosive device was hidden inside the pulpit at the front of the mosque, Mr Sahebzada said.

People gather at the scene of the explosion in Shakar Dara district Pic: AP
Image:
People gather at the scene of the explosion in Shakar Dara district. Pic: AP
A man holds a blood-stained turban and cap after the explosion Pic: AP
Image:
A man holds a blood-stained turban and cap after the explosion. Pic: AP

“I was afraid of a second explosion so I came immediately to my home,” he added.

It comes just days after a powerful car bomb attack claimed dozens of lives including many students.

The Taliban has denied involvement and condemned the attack.

Earlier this week, US troops left their southern Kandahar air base, where some NATO forces still remain.

More than 30,000 American soldiers were stationed in the region, the Taliban heartland, during the peak of the war.

Source link

Continue Reading

Latest News

COVID-19: The three days in April that may have fuelled UK outbreak of Indian coronavirus variant | UK News

Published

on

If the new Indian variant does install itself as the main variant of COVID-19 in this country; if it does lead to more cases and in turn more deaths – and both of those remain big ifs – the question of how this happened is likely to focus on three days in April.

And the spotlight will likely fall not just on the scientists advising the prime minister, but on Boris Johnson himself.

For the decision to delay putting India on the red list of countries, from which travel is heavily limited, and the decision to implement this not immediately but with a gap of just over three days – during which thousands of travellers from India entered the country amid a surge of demand for flights – happened in the shadow of one of the biggest of all political and economic stories of recent decades: Brexit.

Live COVID updates from the UK and around the world

Boris Johnson
Image:
Boris Johnson had been determined to visit India and seal a trade deal

One of the overarching ambitions of this country since leaving the European Union and ending the transition period at the end of last year, has been to seal as many trade deals as possible with as many of the world’s leading economies.

With the arrival of Joe Biden in the White House, ambitions of agreeing a trade deal with the US any time soon were scaled back (the working ambition is now “at some point before the US mid-term elections”) and attention swung to other major economies.

India has long been a promising target for those at the Department for International Trade.

It is not just former colonial ties which make it attractive: Indian companies are now among the biggest investors in the UK and Britain has something of a trump card in these talks: visas.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How concerning is Indian COVID variant?

The Indian government has often sought to increase the number of visas available to Indian citizens to travel, work and study in the UK. Any travel restrictions remain a sore point. There are other low-hanging fruit too, including a long-standing dispute over Scotch whisky which the EU’s negotiators have failed to resolve in recent years.

Sealing a deal, even a provisional one, with one of the world’s fastest growing and dynamic economies, has long been a goal for the prime minister.

The fact that he might be able to declare victory in the battle over Scotch, and the tantalising prospect of agreeing a deal before the EU – which is also in parallel trade discussions with India – only added to the allure.

All of which is why Mr Johnson had been so determined to make India the destination for his first major foreign visit as prime minister. The trip had originally been slated for January, but was delayed as the UK faced a sharp increase in COVID cases.

It was rearranged for late April, with Mr Johnson due to fly out for meetings and negotiations on April 25.

The working plan was that Mr Johnson would be able to announce that early discussions were now under way about a deal – and that formal negotiations would begin in the autumn. There would be talk of more visas for Indian migrants and of resolving the long-standing impasse on Scotch.

A woman receives oxygen support for free outside a Sikh temple in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Image:
People have been forced to desperately source their own oxygen during India’s COVID surge

It was to be one of the early “wins” for the PM as he sought to underline the economic opportunities that lay outside the EU.

Yet as the date of the visit approached, the epidemiological data coming out of the Indian subcontinent began to deteriorate. Cases of COVID-19 had been rising fast throughout March, causing concern amid the global public health community.

Data on cases and deaths in India has never been as reliable as the numbers in Europe, with many epidemiologists suspecting vast undercounting of infections and deaths both last year and this. But even this likely undercounted data had begun to show a significant uptick in cases by late March.

By 2 April there was enough disquiet that the UK added the two countries neighbouring India on its east and west, Pakistan and Bangladesh, to its “red list”. Foreign travellers from countries on the list cannot travel to this country; UK and Irish citizens and residents can enter, but must stay in a government-assigned hotel for a 10 day quarantine period.

The goal of this policy is to prevent the entry to the country of any dangerous variants of the disease – and the South African and Brazilian variants were known to be circulating in these countries.

Yet even as Bangladesh and Pakistan were added to the red list (the implementation took place on 9 April), questions were being asked about why India was not joining them.

In early April there were stories about the country’s cemeteries being overwhelmed. In the days following 2 April the number of new cases of COVID-19 rose beyond an average of 100,000 a day, and then over 200,000 a day. Still India remained off the red list.

It is at this period that the UK started to detect an influx of positive COVID-19 cases from India. According to data from Public Health England, of the 3,345 people arriving from India between 25 March and 7 April, 4.8% tested positive for COVID-19. At that stage, the percentage of people in England with COVID-19 was 0.1%.

It was also at this stage that Public Health England began to pick up arrivals of three Indian variants around the UK.

In particular, the most worrying of all those variants, B1.617.2, which is the variant which is spreading most quickly and has now claimed at least four lives, was first detected in tests carried out on travellers arriving from India on the week ending 29 March.

According to PHE data, at least 122 passengers arriving from Delhi and Mumbai between late March and 26 April were carrying this variant, now designated a “variant of concern”. All but a handful of these travellers would have been allowed, under the rules then in place, to leave the airport and travel home, where they were asked to self-isolate.

Even as cases of the new variant were arriving in the UK, concern was growing in Whitehall about why India had still been left off the red list. There is little publicly released data or methodology on most of these decisions, which are technically in the hands of the Joint Biosecurity Centre.

It says it considers a variety of factors, including the prevalence of the disease in given countries and the quality of the infrastructure there. During this period many in the epidemiological community voiced concern about the omission. Some wondered why the government was taking so long.

Two weeks on from the decision to put Pakistan and Bangladesh on the list, there came an answer of sorts.

On the morning of 19 April, Downing Street announced that the prime minister’s trip to India was cancelled. A few hours after news of the cancellation of the prime ministerial visit, Health Secretary Matt Hancock told the House of Commons that India would also be added to the red list.

By then – the afternoon of 19 April – the daily number of new cases in India had surpassed a quarter of a million. Within a couple of days the official numbers – themselves widely believed to be an undercount of reality – would mean this was officially the biggest outbreak in any country during the entire pandemic.

However, the UK’s decision to place India on the red list was not immediate. Instead, three full days and nights would go by before it would be implemented.

These delays are not unusual during the short history of COVID travel restrictions. Invariably when a country is added to the list it is given a period of time – often up to a week – for travellers to make the necessary plans in advance.

However, there is nothing to stop ministers imposing these restrictions far sooner. Indeed, when the hotel quarantine scheme was first announced, Downing Street briefed journalists that countries could be added to the list “at a few hours’ notice”. That did not happen with India.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

23 April: Travellers from India rush back to UK

In the following three days demand for flights between India and the UK shot through the roof.

Travel website Skyscanner reported a 250% leap in searches for flights from India to the UK. There are typically 30 such flights a week.

In those days, four airlines requested to operate an extra eight flights from India due to the surge in demand ahead of the implementation of the hotel quarantine. The requests were turned down, but thousands of passengers nonetheless travelled into the UK.

Even before this three-day period, the proportion of cases of B 1.617.2 imported from India had been on the rise. But between 4 April and 2 May, this variant rose from 4.9% of all cases detected among travellers, to 40.9%.

The single biggest increase in these weekly numbers was the week which included the three and a half days between the afternoon of 19 April and the early morning of 23 April.

It is worth underlining that it is still much too early to say whether the B 1.617.2 will indeed change the course of the pandemic in the UK. It is certainly spreading faster than any other variant of concern since the famous Kent variant which established itself as the dominant strain of the virus in the winter.

However it remains a small fraction of the total of cases, which are themselves small in comparison with recent months.

People line up outside a mobile vaccination centre, amid the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in Bolton, Britain, May 13, 2021. REUTERS/Phil Noble
Image:
Surge testing is under way in towns where the variant has taken hold

As of 5 May, the percentage of people in England with any variant of COVID-19 had dropped to just 0.07%, the lowest level since early September, according to data from the Office for National Statistics. Hospitalisations, deaths and case numbers remain low.

However, cases are growing fast in a few areas where the Indian variant seems to have established itself, including Bolton, Blackburn and Leicester. By contrast, a cluster of cases in London seems to be under control.

It is too early to tell whether this presages the beginning of another spread throughout the country.

However, one factor is decisively different from the winter or indeed last year: the majority of UK citizens have now received a first dose of a vaccine, and the early evidence suggests, tentatively, that these vaccines provide adequate protection against this new variant.

Outside of India, there are few countries other than the UK that have quite so many confirmed cases of B1.617.2 – though this may owe itself partly to the fact that this country carries out more gene sequencing than any other country.

Even so, if the Indian variant establishes itself as the dominant strain in the UK, jeopardising the sacrifices and suffering during a third period of lockdown, the prime minister will come under increased scrutiny to answer why the decision was left so late to impose restrictions on travel from India, why travellers were given an extra three and a half days to come to the UK and why the rationale on which country is on or off these travel lists remains so murky.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending