Connect with us

Politics

REVEALED: How Whitehall thought British public TOO STUPID to be trusted with EU decision

Published

on

Politics

Pentagon report warns of threat from white supremacists inside the military

Published

on

A Defense Department report highlights disturbing examples of white supremacy inside the military, calling for changes in how the department screens recruits for possible ties to domestic extremism.

The report, which the Trump administration drafted last year before the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, was sent to Congress in October, but it has not been made public until now.

It describes one case in which a Florida National Guards member, who was part of a neo-Nazi group, was chatting in an online forum with a fellow white supremacist, bragging that he makes no secret of his racist ideology among his colleagues.

“Are you worried at all about being found by your mates or someone, now being in the U.S. military?” he was asked.

The guard membersman replied: “I was 100% open about everything with the friends I made at training. They know about it all. They love me too cause I’m a funny guy.”

The exchange appeared in an extremist “Iron March” online forum in 2016, part of a database that the news site Ars Technica published in 2019. A screenshot from the chat appears in the Pentagon’s report to Congress, which examines efforts to prevent white supremacists from joining the military.

The report, which was first obtained by Roll Call, does not estimate the number of white supremacists in the military, although it says the number is low in a force of more than 2 million active-duty members and reservists.

But it warns that even a small number of extremists poses a threat to national security and to the cohesion of the armed forces, citing murders, foiled terrorist plots and other incidents linked to white supremacists in the ranks over the past decade.

“Despite a low number of cases in absolute terms, individuals with extremist affiliations and military experience are a concern to U.S. national security because of their proven ability to execute high-impact events,” the report said.

Domestic extremist groups view the membership of active-duty U.S. forces as “highly prized,” because service members can bring “legitimacy” to their cause and help them attract more recruits, according to the report.

“Access to service members with combat training and technical weapons expertise can also increase both the probability of success and the potency of planned violent attacks,” it said.

After the deadly siege of the Capitol last month by a pro-Trump mob, the new defense secretary, Lloyd Austin, ordered a militarywide stand-down to allow commanders to hold discussions with members about the threat posed by extremism. A number of current and former service members face federal charges in connection with the storming of the Capitol.

Lawmakers ordered the Defense Department to prepare the report after they raised questions last year about how it screens recruits and about recent cases of service members linked to white supremacist causes.

The report recounts how some service members were discharged after they were found to be active supporters of the neo-Nazi group known as the Atomwaffen Division and the white nationalist American Identity Group.

Others were disciplined but not kicked out of the force, it said.

A Marine involved in the deadly “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017 was discharged for his ties to the Atomwaffen Division in 2018. Another member trying to recruit members for the organization enlisted in the Navy, the report said.

As of 2017, a member of the American Identity Movement was enlisted with the Alabama National Guard and worked as a civilian security guard for a leading far-right figure, Richard Spencer, according to the report.

In another chat on the Iron March forum, a user who calls himself an infantryman described how fellow white nationalists find one another through fascist symbols, the report says.

“A good way people in the military find other rightists is to simply wear a shirt with some obscure fascist logo,” the person wrote, according to the report. “I met my good buddy at a brigade luncheon when he noticed the Totenkopf on my shirt.”

Tattoos and security clearances

The report recommended that the Pentagon work more closely with the FBI, including the bureau’s Cryptanalysis and Racketeering Records Unit and its National Gang Intelligence Center, to help spot possible white supremacists applying to join the military. Those offices could help the Defense Department identify tattoos or other telltale symbols during the recruitment process, it said.

The report said that security clearance checks should include questions worded in a clearer way to spot white supremacist links and that federal agencies need to agree on a consistent definition of what constitutes domestic extremism.

The authors also recommended more training of military recruiters and others involved in overseeing who joins the force, including using the FBI’s counterterrorism expertise.

The Defense Department, however, sounded a note of caution about screening potential recruits’ social media posts. The department is exploring the use of social media information in background checks, but “more review and analysis are required before we will be able to determine how and if we can integrate this information into the background check process,” it said.

There is a risk of relying too heavily on reviews of social media data, it said. “Databases alone cannot provide a full, whole-person determination of applicants,” the report said.

The report examined recruitment only and did not look at how to handle extremism among current service members.

“Given its narrow focus, it does make several suggestions that I think are good or viable,” said Mark Pitcavage, a senior research fellow who studies extremism for the Anti-Defamation League.

He said white supremacy and anti-government extremism have periodically surged in American society and in the military dating to the 1980s. But, he said, the Pentagon has never enacted the kind of sweeping reforms necessary to tackle the problem.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

McConnell says he would ‘absolutely’ support Trump as 2024 nominee

Published

on

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Thursday he would “absolutely” support former President Donald Trump if he won the GOP’s 2024 presidential nominee.

“Well there’s a lot to happen between now and ’24,” McConnell said in an interview with Fox News. “I’ve got at least four members that I think are planning to run for president plus some governors and others; There’s no incumbent, a wide-open race and should be fun for you all to cover.”

When asked if he would support Trump, who has hinted at a second run, became the Republican nominee, he said, “Absolutely.” GOP Sens. Josh Hawley of Missouri and Tom Cotton of Arkansas as well as former U.N ambassador Nikki Haley have also been mentioned as potential candidates.

McConnell’s remarks come weeks after the Republican leader voted to acquit Trump at his impeachment trial while also criticizing his “disgraceful dereliction of duty” on Jan. 6. The Senate voted 57-43 to convict him but fell short of the two-thirds majority needed.

“There’s no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day. No question about it,” McConnell said at the time. “The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president.”

McConnell said he voted not guilty on the single charge of incitement of insurrection solely because Trump’s no longer in office — and not because he believed the former president hadn’t incited the crowd that stormed the Capitol, which resulted in five deaths.

Trump, in turn, slammed McConnell in a statement after the impeachment vote as a “political hack” who “doesn’t have what it takes” to lead the party.

“The Republican Party can never again be respected or strong with political ‘leaders’ like Sen. Mitch McConnell at its helm,” Trump said in a 600-word statement where he also blamed McConnell for Republicans’ losing two key Senate seats in a special election in Georgia.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Senate ruling says Democrats can’t put $15 minimum wage in Covid relief bill

Published

on

WASHINGTON — A ruling in the Senate on Thursday dealt a severe blow to Democrats’ hopes of raising the minimum wage in the Covid-19 relief package, likely dooming the proposal in the legislation that is headed for a vote in Congress.

The parliamentarian, the in-house referee, ruled that the provision was not compliant with rules governing the budget process that Congress is using to pass the bill with simple majorities.

“We are deeply disappointed in this decision,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. “We are not going to give up the fight to raise the minimum wage to $15 to help millions of struggling American workers and their families. The American people deserve it, and we are committed to making it a reality.”

The so-called “Byrd rule” limits acceptable provisions in the reconciliation process to taxing and spending. Democrats can still try to pass a wage hike through regular order, but that would require 60 Senate votes, which all but assures failure due to a lack of Republican support.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the ranking Republican on the Budget Committee, praised the referee’s ruling.

“Very pleased the Senate Parliamentarian has ruled that a minimum wage increase is an inappropriate policy change in reconciliation,” Graham said in a statement. “This decision reinforces reconciliation cannot be used as a vehicle to pass major legislative change — by either party — on a simple majority vote. This decision will, over time, reinforce the traditions of the Senate.”

Democrats, led by Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., had made a case for including the provision in the package.

Sanders said he strongly disagreed with the ruling and suggested another way to incentivize a wage hike through the budget process.

“In the coming days, I will be working with my colleagues in the Senate to move forward with an amendment to take tax deductions away from large, profitable corporations that don’t pay workers at least $15 an hour and to provide small businesses with the incentives they need to raise wages,” he said in a statement. “That amendment must be included in this reconciliation bill.”

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., a leading proponent of the $15 wage, said earlier that it would be unacceptable for Democrats to willingly back off the provision, but she acknowledged that the parliamentarian could rule it non-compliant.

“The parliamentarian essentially a legislative reference,” Ocasio-Cortez told reporters earlier Thursday, before the ruling. “If something is out of bounds, it’s out of bounds, as per the rules.”

Senate experts say that Vice President Kamala Harris has the authority to ignore the parliamentarian and rule the wage hike compliant, but the White House isn’t considering that.

“Not sure if it’s ever happened in the past,” White House chief of staff Ron Klain told MSNBC’s Joy Reid on Wednesday. “Certainly, that’s not something we would do. We’re going to honor the rules of the Senate and work within that system to get this bill passed.”

The parliamentarian’s ruling immediately revived calls from some progressive activists for Democrats to abolish the Senate’s 60-vote threshold for passing most legislation, which they can do with a majority vote in the chamber.

Eli Zupnick, a spokesman for the Fix Our Senate coalition, said there is “no reason” for the party not to extend the simple majority process they’re using for Covid relief “to increasing the minimum wage, passing HR1 and the Voting Rights Act, and delivering on the many popular promises they made that Sen. McConnell can currently veto with a filibuster.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending