Connect with us


Rick Gates charged in Mueller’s Russia probe: Who is he?



Richard Gates, a business associate of President Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, is facing additional charges of  tax evasion and bank fraud.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling into the 2016 presidential election, filed a 32-count indictment on Feb. 22 against Gates and Manafort.

Gates, 45, is accused of 11 counts related to filing false income tax returns and three counts of failure to report foreign bank and financial accounts.

Manafort, 68, is charged with five counts related to filing false income tax returns and four of failing to report foreign bank and financial accounts.

Both men are accused of nine counts of bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud.

Prosecutors claim the men doctored documents to inflate the income of their businesses, then used those fraudulent documents to obtain loans. They also accuse Manafort of evading taxes from 2010 through 2014, and in some of those years concealing his foreign bank accounts.

The charges against Manafort and Gates don’t relate to any allegations of misconduct related to Trump’s 2016 campaign.

The two men were initially charged in a 12-count indictment last October that accused them of a multimillion-dollar money-laundering conspiracy tied to their foreign lobbying work. They are accused of directing a covert Washington lobbying campaign on behalf of pro-Russian Ukrainian interests.

Manafort and Gates pleaded not guilty to the initial charges.

Who is Rick Gates?

FILE - In this July 21, 2016 file photo, Rick Gates, campaign aide to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland.  Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and a former business associate, Rick Gates, have been told to surrender to federal authorities Monday, according to reports and a person familiar with the matter.(AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

Richard Gates is a former campaign aide to President Donald Trump.

 (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Gates is a protégée of Manafort, a June New York Times report said.

Gates, too, worked for the Trump campaign – and outlasted Manafort. Like Manafort, Gates helped wrangle delegates at the high-stakes 2016 Republican National Convention.

The onetime deputy campaign manager also helped start the nonprofit America First Policies (AFP), created to help advance the White House’s agenda. But Gates eventually left the group, reportedly due to his ties to Manafort.

However, the group recently received a request from the special counsel’s office to retain its records for possible production for that office, Fox News has learned.

Erin Montgomery, a spokesperson for AFP, distanced the nonprofit from Gates. 

“We believe it is important to clarify that Rick Gates’ association with America First Policies was informal and limited, and, as noted in press reports, ended around March of this year,” Montgomery told Fox News. 


But even after leaving the nonprofit, Gates still visited the White House multiple times, the Daily Beast reported in June. The publication added that Gates is disliked by Trump.

How is he connected to the Russia investigation?

During Manafort’s work with Ukraine, Gates would fly to Moscow to take meetings with Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, The New York Times reported. And Gates’ name has appeared on documents linked to companies that Manafort’s firm has set up to receive payments in Eastern Europe, according to the newspaper.

“Everything was done legally and with the approval of our lawyers,” Gates has told The Times. “Nothing to my knowledge was ever done inappropriately.”

Gates was also involved in a 2011 Ukranian racketeering lawsuit that also named Manafort.

Gates pleaded not guilty to the initial charges on Oct. 30. 

“He welcomes the opportunity to confront these charges in court,” Glenn Selig, a spokesman for Gates, told Fox News.

“This fight is just beginning,” Selig added.

Fox News’ Kaitlyn Schallhorn, Brooke Singman, James Rosen, Jodie Curtis and Samuel Chamberlain contributed to this report. The Associated Press also contributed to this report.

Source link


EU's devastating role in triggering Black Wednesday laid bare – 'Torpedoed the pound!'



THE UK was plunged into an economic crisis in September 1992 and an expert has claimed the EU was partly to blame for triggering the financial crash.

Source link

Continue Reading


Budget 2021: Sunak blasted for 'wasteful' freeports plan



BUDGET 2021 saw Chancellor Rishi Sunak unveil fiscal policy support designed to help the country weather the final months of lockdown and beyond. However, one of his policies, an extension of “freeports”, has been branded a “wasteful” use of taxpayer money.

Source link

Continue Reading


Federal judge says states acted too late to ratify Equal Rights Amendment



WASHINGTON — A federal district court judge ruled late Friday that recent state votes to ratify the proposed Equal Rights Amendment came too late to make it part of the Constitution.

The ruling was a defeat for ERA supporters and the three states that asked the judge to declare that the amendment became formally adopted after Virginia last year became the 38th state to ratify it.

Along with Illinois and Nevada, Virginia argued that the Constitution does not give Congress any power to set a time limit on the ratification process. They also argued that the deadline had no force of law, since it was placed only in the amendment’s proposing clause, not in the actual text that the states voted on.

But Judge Rudolph Contreras of the federal district court in Washington, D.C., said the vote “came after both the original and extended deadlines that Congress attached to the ERA.” A ratification deadline in the introduction “is just as effective as one in the text of a proposed amendment.”

The states now have the option of appealing the ruling. The case is likely headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Originally proposed in 1972, passed overwhelmingly in both chambers of Congress and endorsed by President Richard Nixon, it would amend the Constitution to add this provision: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or a abridged by the United States or any state on account of sex.” It would also give Congress power to pass laws enforcing the provision.

Article V of the Constitution provides that once approved by Congress, a proposed amendment is adopted when ratified by three-fourths of the states. Virginia said its vote in January 2020 put the ERA over the finish line.

In proposing the amendment, Congress said the ERA would become valid when ratified by the required number of states “within seven years from the date of submission by the Congress.” Another congressional vote extended the deadline, but only by three years — to 1982.

Judge Contreras did not rule on a separate issue involving five states that originally voted to ratify the amendment but then voted to rescind their approval.

He said his ruling expressed no opinion on the merits of the ERA as a matter of policy. “It merely enforces a procedural time limit that Congress set when proposing the amendment.”

Among supporters of the ERA were advocates of abortion rights. NARAL Pro-Choice America said it would “reinforce the constitutional right to abortion” and “require judges to strike down anti-abortion laws.”

Abortion opponents agreed with that analysis and fought to prevent federal recognition of ratification. “It would nullify any federal or state restrictions, even on partial-birth or third-trimester abortions,” said the National Right To Life Committee.

Source link

Continue Reading