Connect with us

Politics

Brexit Committee meets Barnier and Verhofstadt – but only THREE Eurosceptics attend

Published

on

Politics

Here’s why Xavier Becerra’s confirmation critics gained no traction by attacking his Catholicism

Published

on

As a nun who led one of the largest national Catholic health care organizations in the country, I know that no other federal agency works as much to protect and advance the health and well-being of families as the Department of Health and Human Services.

That’s why I was relieved and thrilled when President Joe Biden announced his intention in December to nominate California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, a leader whose character is rooted in his Catholic upbringing and values, to be secretary of health and human services. I know he is the right person to lead the agency in this moment, as he showed at his confirmation hearing Tuesday.

Last month, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., claimed on the Senate floor that Becerra’s health care experience was limited to suing those “who dare to live out their religious convictions” — a reference to the involvement of Becerra’s office, along with officials from other states, in lawsuits defending the women’s health-related provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

Skeptics like McConnell, driven mostly by this issue, seem to think Becerra lacks the family values that are inherently Catholic — but I know far better. Becerra comes from a long faith tradition and values integrity, hard work and treating everyone with dignity and respect. He has dedicated his life to public service and to improving the lives of the families he serves.

Xavier Becerra’s Catholic faith underpins his dedication to ensuring every family has both dignity and access to health care.

As our country continues to battle a deadly pandemic, we need his leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services now more than ever.

Becerra has a deep knowledge of the ins and outs of the health care system — a knowledge hard-earned through his decades in public service. His work on drafting, passing and protecting the Affordable Care Act is proof of his experience in health care policy and his commitment to getting Americans the health care they need. This experience is invaluable, and it makes him uniquely suited to serve as health and human services secretary.

I have long advocated for health care reform, including the Affordable Care Act that Becerra helped craft. I remember being in meetings with him back when he represented California in Congress. I was moved by his commitment to getting people health care coverage, no matter their circumstances. He knew that everyone deserves health care and made sure that no one was left out when he was writing the bill.

Later, when he became California’s attorney general, he worked hard to defend the law against efforts to eliminate it or minimize its impact on all the people it helped, all of which came from baseless legal challenges.

Becerra comes from a long faith tradition and values integrity, hard work and treating everyone with dignity and respect.

Xavier Becerra’s Catholic faith underpins his dedication to ensuring that every family has both dignity and access to health care. Both are especially important during the coronavirus pandemic, which has laid bare some of the worst inequities in our health care system. Communities of color are experiencing the worst of Covid-19, including disproportionately higher infection rates, more severe cases, higher death rates and less access to vaccinations. Becerra is committed to ending these inequities in Covid-19 care and pursuing a more just health care system for all Americans in the long term.

So many Americans are facing health challenges tied to this public health crisis, which is why we need a leader at HHS who understands the importance of access to care for everyone.

Because of his parents’ immigrant experience, Becerra saw in his own life the challenges that families at all income levels face. His parents instilled in him not only his strong faith, but also the importance of working hard and the dignity of all humans who are created in the image of God.

I believe this experience informed his belief that everyone deserves health care.

Becerra has long said he is driven by the belief that everyone who works hard in our country deserves an opportunity to get ahead, including being able to send their children to college and to retire with dignity. That is both a Catholic value and an American value; protecting that value starts with protecting our loved ones’ health.

We need a secretary at the Department of Health and Human Services who knows that everyone deserves access to health care — period. Xavier Becerra’s decades of experience, strong faith tradition and life of public service make him the perfect fit to bring our country through this catastrophe and ensure a healthy future for all Americans. He is a highly qualified nominee who knows what’s at stake in this country, and the Senate should ignore these spurious attacks on his character and instead move quickly to confirm him.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Boris faces Union crisis as SNP vow to ‘speed up’ desperate Scottish independence bid

Published

on

NICOLA Sturgeon is going head to head with Boris Johnson as the SNP ramp up their independence referendum plans ahead of an intense six week campaign period for the Holyrood elections.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Gov. Cuomo says New York couldn’t report nursing home deaths in hospitals. But other states did.

Published

on

When New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo was first accused of undercounting nursing home deaths from Covid-19, his administration offered a simple explanation:

The state did not include nursing home residents who died in the hospital in the publicly posted tally of coronavirus deaths linked to long-term care facilities, officials said, because it wanted to avoid a “double count” of those deaths in the statewide total.

But New York stands apart from other states in taking this approach to counting nursing home deaths, research experts said — a decision that made New York’s tally of nursing home deaths appear lower than it was, and that is now under federal investigation.

“It’s tricky to compare state-level data, but New York is the only state that explicitly stated that they were excluding hospital-based deaths,” said Priya Chidambaram, a senior policy analyst at the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit research organization.

By contrast, officials in other states, including Minnesota, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Vermont, said in recent interviews that they found ways to total all nursing home deaths, including residents who died at hospitals, without counting them twice, by cross-referencing the reports from nursing homes with other data sources. Research experts, including Chidambaram, said they were not aware of any other state that counted nursing home deaths as New York did.

That has left both policymakers and researchers wondering why New York didn’t find a similar workaround to avoid leaving out thousands of nursing home deaths from its reported total.

“New York is an outlier of sorts when it comes to this issue,” said David Grabowski, a long-term care expert and policy professor at Harvard Medical School.

Every state has developed its own method for counting Covid-19 deaths in nursing homes, as well as the general population. And New York said explicitly from the early months of the pandemic that its publicly posted count of nursing home deaths only included those that occurred on the premises, as opposed to at a hospital or elsewhere.

The state took this approach to avoid including those deaths twice in its total of all New York residents who had died from Covid-19, the state’s health commissioner, Dr. Howard Zucker, told state lawmakers during an August hearing on the administration’s handling of nursing homes during the pandemic.

“We don’t want to double count — this person died here, and also died there,” Zucker said, describing the Cuomo administration as being “incredibly transparent on information.”

New York officials also said it was important to verify reports of residents who died at hospitals before making those numbers public, as the information provided by nursing homes was not always accurate, especially during the chaotic early days of the pandemic.

“It’s natural to assume they might not have as much information as what happened inside their walls,” said Gary Holmes, a spokesman for the state health department.

Full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak

That approach, however, led New York to omit a huge number of deaths from its publicly reported nursing home total until recently. The state had said that about 8,500 nursing home residents had died from Covid-19. But when New York finally included residents who died in hospitals, the total shot up to about 15,000 — more than any other state as of late January, according to a state-by-state count of long-term deaths compiled by the Kaiser Family Foundation. And the state only released the new total after its own attorney general issued a report last month accusing the Cuomo administration of undercounting the deaths.

The New York health department said the delay in releasing the number of hospital-based deaths was due to a time-consuming verification process. The Covid-19 reports that nursing homes and hospitals submit daily only include the initials and age of residents who died “to protect patient privacy,” Holmes said.

While more detailed data on hospital deaths is available, the information is entered into a separate system that often lags and does not include the name of a patient’s nursing home, he added. “Great lengths have been taken to ensure accuracy in data reporting from multiple sources.”

Holmes also said the newly released numbers did not change the overall death toll in New York from the virus, since all nursing home deaths had been included in the statewide count, regardless of the place where they occurred.

Officials in other states in the Northeast and elsewhere told NBC News that they took a different approach to compile a comprehensive count of resident deaths — regardless of whether they occurred at a hospital or at the facility — to avoid the double-counting problem that New York officials were concerned about.

In Minnesota, for example, “deaths are categorized by place of residence,” said Scott Smith, a spokesman for the state’s public health department.

The state relies on self-reported data from nursing homes, which are asked to provide demographic information, date and place of death, and other information. Minnesota also collects data from hospitals, laboratories, medical examiners and death certificates to match reports and exclude duplicate entries to avoid double-counting, Smith said.

Similarly, Connecticut uses self-reported data from nursing homes, which are required to report all resident deaths “whether they occur in their facilities or after transfer to a hospital,” said David Dearborn, a spokesman for the state health department.

The state also relies on reports from the state medical examiner to prevent double-counting in the overall death toll, Dearborn said. “This process ensures an accurate statewide total.”

Massachusetts uses a similar approach, cross-referencing nursing home reports with death certificates to avoid duplicate entries to capture total Covid-19 deaths in the state, a state health spokesman said.

While the pandemic was unprecedented in many ways, the data challenges associated with it are not new, said Grabowski, the Harvard Medical School professor.

“Historically, public health officials have often had to distinguish between site of death and immediate residence prior to death,” he said. “I don’t see any reason why other states were able to classify prior residence and New York was not.”

The basic data should have been readily available to New York officials, said Bill Hammond, senior fellow for health policy at the Empire Center, a right-leaning think tank that sued the state for failing to release its data on nursing home deaths. According to New York’s data collection form, obtained through the lawsuit, nursing homes are specifically asked for “the total number of Covid-19 residents who have died outside your facility,” as well as the total number who died in the facility itself.

“This is not a complicated thing to do,” said Hammond, who believes New York officials should have released both hospital and nonhospital death counts immediately, then cross-checked the information later if they thought it was necessary.

“They’re using the need for maximum accuracy and the difficulty of reconciling the two data sets as a rationale for postponing” the release of public information, he said.

There are other differences between the states, as well as broader inconsistencies in the data. New York and Minnesota, for instance, are among the states that include probable Covid-19 cases in death counts, but some only count lab-confirmed cases.

Some states included staff members in the total number of deaths associated with long-term care facilities, while others did not include them, or separated them out. Some states took months before releasing detailed information on nursing home deaths. And facilities themselves may not always report accurate information.

The long-term care industry itself is skeptical that more data would have made a big difference in the overall response to the pandemic.

“It’s just another piece of data that may show something or may not,” said James Clyne, CEO and president of LeadingAge New York, which represents nonprofit long-term care facilities. “Has anybody looked at it and come to any conclusions? It’s not like anybody had this epiphany because this information was given out.”

But researchers say that complete information from the states is important to understanding the full impact of the pandemic on nursing homes. During the worst months of the pandemic, such data could help public health officials decide where to send resources first, advocates said. It could also help researchers identify which factors left facilities most vulnerable to Covid-19 cases and deaths, and which policy decisions seem to help protect residents and staff members.

In the early months of the pandemic, for instance, the Cuomo administration came under fire for requiring nursing homes to accept recovering Covid-19 patients discharged from hospitals — a decision intended to clear much-needed space in hospitals. The guidance was effectively reversed by May, and state officials released an analysis stating it was not a driver of nursing home outbreaks. But more comprehensive data on resident deaths could help provide more definitive answers, experts and advocates said.

Download the NBC News app for full coverage and alerts about the coronavirus outbreak

New York state Sen. Gustavo Rivera, a Democrat from the Bronx who chairs the health committee, recently introduced a bill requiring the state to disclose the deaths of residents who died after being transferred to the hospital, criticizing the state’s decision to exclude them.

“Families and residents alike have suffered not knowing what is going on in the facilities during the Covid pandemic,” the bill said.

The federal government did not start collecting national data on Covid-19 cases and deaths in nursing homes until the first week of May, and facilities were not required to provide information about the previous months. So the state and local governments were the only ones keeping track since the beginning of the pandemic — which is another reason why New York’s nursing home numbers are so important, researchers said.

“Accurate data is the foundation of policy that addresses actual needs — what policies were the most helpful? What policies were the least helpful?” said Chidambaram, of the Kaiser Family Foundation. “The lack of accurate numbers did do a disservice.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending